I love SHAMS!

In light of the scientific evidence that points toward a Creator and the historical evidence for the resurrection of Jesus

What evidence? Also even if there is evidence of a creator it does not follow that this creator is the Abrahamic God\Christian Jesus. It could just as easily be Odin who clearly made the world from the frozen bones of his slain father.

I would argue that rather than focusing on your imagined issue with dishonesty in Christianity, you should focus on helping your fellow atheists out by looking less like the stereotypical hateful, anti-God madman, and show a little of the compassion that many atheists say they have for the poor deluded Christians!

You don’t have to be a “stereotypical hateful, anti-God madman” to find that Christianity doesn’t stand critical scrutiny. Furthermore, Aj not having done a good job of applying Hanlon’s Razor isn’t evidence of him being an “anti-God madman.” either. Save the complaints about atheists being stereotypically hateful for the cases where atheists really are being stereotypically hateful.

(a) Atheists by definition can’t deal with unknowns. We Christians live by faith in Christ alone. Dealing with unknowns by faith, believing the Word of the knowable God is how we exist! Atheists instead refuse to bow their knees in humility and repentance to trust the God Who obviously created all things (Read Romans 1 and I John).

That is simply a bizarre sentiment. You accuse atheists of being unable to deal with unknowns, and then defend this statement by saying that Christians deal with unknowns by putting blind faith in absolutes. If anything, your comment is evidence supporting the claim that (at least some) Christians can’t handle doubt and uncertainty, and lean on blind faith in absolutes as a crutch.

(b) Atheists can’t contemplate being a Christian because they have never been born again. Can you know what it is like to be a tadpole? Only if you are a frog. But a tadpole has no idea what it is like to be a frog… yet!

Not only can I contemplate being a Christian, I used to be one myself. Unlike Lee Strobel, I don’t have a generic by-the-numbers (de)conversion story. A lot of factors, both intellectual and emotional, contributed to my very gradual move away from religion. But when I was young, I was very devout. I became especially devout after my grandfather, who was a minister, died when I was ten. I prayed regularly, read the Bible every day, and earnestly believed that I could look forward to joining him in heaven with God. I know how it feels to believe.

(c) Atheists don’t know what it’s like to be a Christian. Again, we are talking about a spiritual truth that is received, not by scientific or mathematic hypothesis and discovery but instead by humble heart repentance and faith.

As I said, I know exactly what it’s like. But the fact that something feels good to believe does not make it true. Sometimes the truth hurts, and is difficult to accept.

(d) The atheist’s “conclusions” are all in defense of UNbelief… rather than in establishing evidence for their unbelief! If fact, (again by definition) NO evidence is available, or CAN be given for your unbelief! It is a moronic idea. Atheists say, “I do not believe in it! Therefore I will argue a case against it!” You atheists surely spend a great deal of time trying to evangelize against a God you say you do not believe exists!

That’s utterly bizarre. You’re saying it’s “moronic” to argue against something you think is untrue? Then why are you arguing against atheism? Atheists argue against the existence of gods because they think the proposition “God exists” is probably false, and they wish to make their point and speak their mind. It is not irrational to offer counterarguments against claims one thinks is false.

Where exactly would you say the dishonesty in Biblical Christianity is made manifest?

There’s a fundamental dishonesty in deciding beforehand that the Bible MUST be true and then scrounging around trying to make all the facts fit your preconceptions. An honest appraisal of the facts allows for the possibility that one’s own beliefs might come out false. Biblical Christianity does not allow for this possibility, and is therefore intrinsically dishonest.

I would argue that rather than focusing on your imagined issue with dishonesty in Christianity, you should focus on helping your fellow atheists out by looking less like the stereotypical hateful, anti-God madman, and show a little of the compassion that many atheists say they have for the poor deluded Christians!

The above is so ludicrous that I lack words to describe it. You, sir, are in no position to lecture others about compassion, as your comments above demonstrate no compassion or understanding whatsoever for atheists. And your post indicates that you do not have the moral high ground when it comes to calling others hateful madmen. Your comments ooze with smug self-righteousness.