<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pat Condell&#8217;s Latest Video Removed from YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/10/01/pat-condells-latest-video-removed-from-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/10/01/pat-condells-latest-video-removed-from-youtube/</link>
	<description>Atheism with Positivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:52:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diane G.</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/10/01/pat-condells-latest-video-removed-from-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-231623</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 05:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4938#comment-231623</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; Einmaliger Says:

October 2nd, 2008 at 3:12 am 
When YouTube gets a complain about any video, it removes it. I don’t see any political motivation here. Maybe we should request the removal of some christian videos? Could be fun. But then again, we as atheists are fair and support free speech.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That was the first thing that occurred to me--registering complaints about religious propaganda.  Maybe it could still be done, under the rationale of seeing just how far such knee-jerk censorship could be taken...Heck, just randomly objecting to any annoying vid would work--not just the religious ones..

And then I could see a popular site springing up: &quot;BannedOnYouTube!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Einmaliger Says:</p>
<p>October 2nd, 2008 at 3:12 am<br />
When YouTube gets a complain about any video, it removes it. I don’t see any political motivation here. Maybe we should request the removal of some christian videos? Could be fun. But then again, we as atheists are fair and support free speech.
</p></blockquote>
<p>That was the first thing that occurred to me&#8211;registering complaints about religious propaganda.  Maybe it could still be done, under the rationale of seeing just how far such knee-jerk censorship could be taken&#8230;Heck, just randomly objecting to any annoying vid would work&#8211;not just the religious ones..</p>
<p>And then I could see a popular site springing up: &#8220;BannedOnYouTube!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Myers</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/10/01/pat-condells-latest-video-removed-from-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-231545</link>
		<dc:creator>J Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4938#comment-231545</guid>
		<description>So youtube is blocking problematic &lt;em&gt;content&lt;/em&gt;?  Why don&#039;t they instead block problematic &lt;em&gt;countries&lt;/em&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So youtube is blocking problematic <em>content</em>?  Why don&#8217;t they instead block problematic <em>countries</em>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spurs Fan</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/10/01/pat-condells-latest-video-removed-from-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-231526</link>
		<dc:creator>Spurs Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4938#comment-231526</guid>
		<description>This video reminded that Pat Condell is kind of an asshole.  

I agree with most of the man&#039;s reasoning and logic and I definitely don&#039;t see why &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; was banned from YouTube.  

Still, he&#039;s kind of a dick.  Anyone else here buy things, not because the want to consume or use them, but rather, because they just want to piss people off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This video reminded that Pat Condell is kind of an asshole.  </p>
<p>I agree with most of the man&#8217;s reasoning and logic and I definitely don&#8217;t see why <em>that</em> was banned from YouTube.  </p>
<p>Still, he&#8217;s kind of a dick.  Anyone else here buy things, not because the want to consume or use them, but rather, because they just want to piss people off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David D.G.</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/10/01/pat-condells-latest-video-removed-from-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-231522</link>
		<dc:creator>David D.G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4938#comment-231522</guid>
		<description>Siamang, that is one heck of a fine bit of writing from Pullman.  That deserves to be spread far and wide.


~David D.G.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Siamang, that is one heck of a fine bit of writing from Pullman.  That deserves to be spread far and wide.</p>
<p>~David D.G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siamang</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/10/01/pat-condells-latest-video-removed-from-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-231517</link>
		<dc:creator>Siamang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4938#comment-231517</guid>
		<description>Philip Pullman, author of The Golden Compass, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2008/09/29/philip-pullman-on-th.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;offers some appropriate thoughts&lt;/a&gt; from last-weeks &quot;Banned Books Week.&quot;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Because they never learn. The inevitable result of trying to ban something – book, film, play, pop song, whatever – is that far more people want to get hold of it than would ever have done if it were left alone. Why don&#039;t the censors realise this?...

In fact, when it comes to banning books, religion is the worst reason of the lot. Religion, uncontaminated by power, can be the source of a great deal of private solace, artistic inspiration, and moral wisdom. But when it gets its hands on the levers of political or social authority, it goes rotten very quickly indeed. The rank stench of oppression wafts from every authoritarian church, chapel, temple, mosque, or synagogue – from every place of worship where the priests have the power to meddle in the social and intellectual lives of their flocks, from every presidential palace or prime ministerial office where civil leaders have to pander to religious ones...

My basic objection to religion is not that it isn&#039;t true; I like plenty of things that aren&#039;t true. It&#039;s that religion grants its adherents malign, intoxicating and morally corrosive sensations. Destroying intellectual freedom is always evil, but only religion makes doing evil feel quite so good. &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philip Pullman, author of The Golden Compass, <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/09/29/philip-pullman-on-th.html" rel="nofollow">offers some appropriate thoughts</a> from last-weeks &#8220;Banned Books Week.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>Because they never learn. The inevitable result of trying to ban something – book, film, play, pop song, whatever – is that far more people want to get hold of it than would ever have done if it were left alone. Why don&#8217;t the censors realise this?&#8230;</p>
<p>In fact, when it comes to banning books, religion is the worst reason of the lot. Religion, uncontaminated by power, can be the source of a great deal of private solace, artistic inspiration, and moral wisdom. But when it gets its hands on the levers of political or social authority, it goes rotten very quickly indeed. The rank stench of oppression wafts from every authoritarian church, chapel, temple, mosque, or synagogue – from every place of worship where the priests have the power to meddle in the social and intellectual lives of their flocks, from every presidential palace or prime ministerial office where civil leaders have to pander to religious ones&#8230;</p>
<p>My basic objection to religion is not that it isn&#8217;t true; I like plenty of things that aren&#8217;t true. It&#8217;s that religion grants its adherents malign, intoxicating and morally corrosive sensations. Destroying intellectual freedom is always evil, but only religion makes doing evil feel quite so good. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrimeNumbers</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/10/01/pat-condells-latest-video-removed-from-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-231513</link>
		<dc:creator>PrimeNumbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4938#comment-231513</guid>
		<description>Just signed the petition. Pat is right that it&#039;s not arbitration in how it&#039;s meant to be because it&#039;s stacked against women, and many Muslims, if Sharia courts are available in England, probably not know they access to the full UK justice system.

We need to stop pandering to Muslims. They&#039;re not special.

And Dear Youtube - give Pat  a shrine on your site for him to speak as he wishes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just signed the petition. Pat is right that it&#8217;s not arbitration in how it&#8217;s meant to be because it&#8217;s stacked against women, and many Muslims, if Sharia courts are available in England, probably not know they access to the full UK justice system.</p>
<p>We need to stop pandering to Muslims. They&#8217;re not special.</p>
<p>And Dear Youtube &#8211; give Pat  a shrine on your site for him to speak as he wishes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axegrrl</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/10/01/pat-condells-latest-video-removed-from-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-231508</link>
		<dc:creator>Axegrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4938#comment-231508</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;HA! I just went to youtube and found two other postings of the banned video from some other subscribers.

Go freedom of speech!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, do a search for &quot;Saudi Britain&quot; right &lt;em&gt;now&lt;/em&gt; and you&#039;ll see that &lt;strong&gt;17&lt;/strong&gt; of the 20 videos on the first page ARE the banned video!

See, &lt;em&gt;that&#039;s&lt;/em&gt; how to respond!  rather than adopting the &#039;ban this because it offends me&#039; approach :)  Beautiful :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>HA! I just went to youtube and found two other postings of the banned video from some other subscribers.</p>
<p>Go freedom of speech!</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, do a search for &#8220;Saudi Britain&#8221; right <em>now</em> and you&#8217;ll see that <strong>17</strong> of the 20 videos on the first page ARE the banned video!</p>
<p>See, <em>that&#8217;s</em> how to respond!  rather than adopting the &#8216;ban this because it offends me&#8217; approach <img src='http://friendlyatheist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Beautiful <img src='http://friendlyatheist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BB401</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/10/01/pat-condells-latest-video-removed-from-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-231505</link>
		<dc:creator>BB401</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4938#comment-231505</guid>
		<description>In my humble opinion, there&#039;s no reason to ban such a video unless the speaker is directly inciting violence against others.  Pat Condell was not.  He was merely voicing an opinion, and opinions about others&#039; religion are often vitriolic or scathing.  Cry me a river, build me a bridge and get over it.

I&#039;d like to see YouTube explain &lt;em&gt;why&lt;/em&gt; they banned his video under the terms of use.  That&#039;ll be good for a larf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my humble opinion, there&#8217;s no reason to ban such a video unless the speaker is directly inciting violence against others.  Pat Condell was not.  He was merely voicing an opinion, and opinions about others&#8217; religion are often vitriolic or scathing.  Cry me a river, build me a bridge and get over it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see YouTube explain <em>why</em> they banned his video under the terms of use.  That&#8217;ll be good for a larf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikespeir</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/10/01/pat-condells-latest-video-removed-from-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-231496</link>
		<dc:creator>mikespeir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4938#comment-231496</guid>
		<description>See how we atheists pick on the Christian religion and give, oh, say, Islam a pass?  That&#039;s because, deep down, we know it&#039;s the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See how we atheists pick on the Christian religion and give, oh, say, Islam a pass?  That&#8217;s because, deep down, we know it&#8217;s the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: recorderjoe</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/10/01/pat-condells-latest-video-removed-from-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-231493</link>
		<dc:creator>recorderjoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4938#comment-231493</guid>
		<description>HA! I just went to youtube and found two other postings of the banned video from some other subscribers.

Go freedom of speech!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA! I just went to youtube and found two other postings of the banned video from some other subscribers.</p>
<p>Go freedom of speech!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
