<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the Recent Mormon Posts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/09/23/thoughts-on-the-recent-mormon-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/09/23/thoughts-on-the-recent-mormon-posts/</link>
	<description>Atheism with Positivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:59:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SarahH</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/09/23/thoughts-on-the-recent-mormon-posts/comment-page-3/#comment-231052</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4778#comment-231052</guid>
		<description>The whole thing reminds me of the last exchange in Burn After Reading:
&lt;blockquote&gt;CIA Superior: What did we learn? 
CIA Officer: Uh... 
CIA Superior: Not to do it again. 
[pause]
CIA Superior: I don&#039;t know what the fuck it is we *did*, but... &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole thing reminds me of the last exchange in Burn After Reading:</p>
<blockquote><p>CIA Superior: What did we learn?<br />
CIA Officer: Uh&#8230;<br />
CIA Superior: Not to do it again.<br />
[pause]<br />
CIA Superior: I don&#8217;t know what the fuck it is we *did*, but&#8230; </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felicia Gilljam</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/09/23/thoughts-on-the-recent-mormon-posts/comment-page-3/#comment-231031</link>
		<dc:creator>Felicia Gilljam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4778#comment-231031</guid>
		<description>I realise this thread is pretty much dead now, but I&#039;d like to point out to Lindsey that several of us have asked for the proper discussion we wanted in the first place, and yet you&#039;re only ever responding to the person (people?) calling you a moron. What&#039;s up with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realise this thread is pretty much dead now, but I&#8217;d like to point out to Lindsey that several of us have asked for the proper discussion we wanted in the first place, and yet you&#8217;re only ever responding to the person (people?) calling you a moron. What&#8217;s up with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spork</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/09/23/thoughts-on-the-recent-mormon-posts/comment-page-3/#comment-230796</link>
		<dc:creator>Spork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 14:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4778#comment-230796</guid>
		<description>Senator Oren Hatch claimed his magic underpants protected his skin from fire where his holy drawers covered him, moron.  That&#039;s certainly a magical pair of underoos.

Go find some magic rocks and pretend your cult makes sense, you whackaloon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Oren Hatch claimed his magic underpants protected his skin from fire where his holy drawers covered him, moron.  That&#8217;s certainly a magical pair of underoos.</p>
<p>Go find some magic rocks and pretend your cult makes sense, you whackaloon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. J. Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/09/23/thoughts-on-the-recent-mormon-posts/comment-page-3/#comment-230704</link>
		<dc:creator>J. J. Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 22:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4778#comment-230704</guid>
		<description>Careful, Lindsey. Where do you get the idea that Spork believes that anyone online cares what s/he thinks, or even worries about it? If you want to attack him/her, attack on real faults, not what you imagine Spork&#039;s thoughts to be. Remember that tinyfrog tried to make claims about what s/he imagined your thoughts to be, and you understandably told tinyfrog where to shove it. Why repeat tinyfrog&#039;s mistake?

Bear in mind that you are dealing with two groups here: 

* jerks whose comments boil down to a noun, a verb, and &quot;moron,&quot; and

* adults who are criticizing your claims without making personal attacks.

I suggest worrying more about the latter than the former.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful, Lindsey. Where do you get the idea that Spork believes that anyone online cares what s/he thinks, or even worries about it? If you want to attack him/her, attack on real faults, not what you imagine Spork&#8217;s thoughts to be. Remember that tinyfrog tried to make claims about what s/he imagined your thoughts to be, and you understandably told tinyfrog where to shove it. Why repeat tinyfrog&#8217;s mistake?</p>
<p>Bear in mind that you are dealing with two groups here: </p>
<p>* jerks whose comments boil down to a noun, a verb, and &#8220;moron,&#8221; and</p>
<p>* adults who are criticizing your claims without making personal attacks.</p>
<p>I suggest worrying more about the latter than the former.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Awesomesauce</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/09/23/thoughts-on-the-recent-mormon-posts/comment-page-3/#comment-230698</link>
		<dc:creator>Awesomesauce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4778#comment-230698</guid>
		<description>I care what he thinks...

Well, I don&#039;t really, but I like to disagree over the internet. It keeps me fresh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I care what he thinks&#8230;</p>
<p>Well, I don&#8217;t really, but I like to disagree over the internet. It keeps me fresh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/09/23/thoughts-on-the-recent-mormon-posts/comment-page-3/#comment-230696</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4778#comment-230696</guid>
		<description>Oh, Spork, for the love of &lt;em&gt;GOD&lt;/em&gt;, no one said the underwear was magic! 
Also, GET OVER IT! 
And just for the record, my beliefs may, in your opinion, be &#039;stupid&#039;, but yet YOU believe that anyone on the internet gives a good goddamn what YOU think. 
So, who&#039;s the &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Spork, for the love of <em>GOD</em>, no one said the underwear was magic!<br />
Also, GET OVER IT!<br />
And just for the record, my beliefs may, in your opinion, be &#8217;stupid&#8217;, but yet YOU believe that anyone on the internet gives a good goddamn what YOU think.<br />
So, who&#8217;s the <em>real</em> moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. J. Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/09/23/thoughts-on-the-recent-mormon-posts/comment-page-2/#comment-230682</link>
		<dc:creator>J. J. Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4778#comment-230682</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In order to live with the cognitive dissonance of believing in magic rocks and magic underpants and that native Americans descended from the populations of the Middle East, one must shut off a part of one’s thinking process. The process of which I speak is the one used to analyze data and reach conclusions based on evidence and the application of reason and logic.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Nice theory. Empirically, it doesn&#039;t quite work. In practice, people can and do have false beliefs while still being able to use reason and logic. Ken Miller is one example. If you want to go back far enough, the Founding Fathers are an example. If you really think these people are &quot;dumber than a sweater on a cat,&quot; then you are far more reality-challenged than the people that you rail against.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I asked her how she could believe in a religion founded by a guy with magic glasses. Her response was a tautological fallacy about the book of Mormon. That’s it! That’s all she had to offer! No critical thoughts about it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In other words, she acted like someone &lt;em&gt;untrained&lt;/em&gt; in critical thinking. Lindsey isn&#039;t bird-brained; she&#039;s ape-brained--&lt;em&gt;as are the rest of us&lt;/em&gt;. Like most products of evolution, the human mind is a messy kluge that uses quick and dirty heuristics. We are no more natural skeptics than we are natural mathematicians. That doesn&#039;t make Lindsey an idiot; it just makes her unpracticed.

If you can&#039;t tell the difference between being unpracticed and being a moron, what does that make you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In order to live with the cognitive dissonance of believing in magic rocks and magic underpants and that native Americans descended from the populations of the Middle East, one must shut off a part of one’s thinking process. The process of which I speak is the one used to analyze data and reach conclusions based on evidence and the application of reason and logic.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nice theory. Empirically, it doesn&#8217;t quite work. In practice, people can and do have false beliefs while still being able to use reason and logic. Ken Miller is one example. If you want to go back far enough, the Founding Fathers are an example. If you really think these people are &#8220;dumber than a sweater on a cat,&#8221; then you are far more reality-challenged than the people that you rail against.</p>
<blockquote><p>I asked her how she could believe in a religion founded by a guy with magic glasses. Her response was a tautological fallacy about the book of Mormon. That’s it! That’s all she had to offer! No critical thoughts about it.</p></blockquote>
<p>In other words, she acted like someone <em>untrained</em> in critical thinking. Lindsey isn&#8217;t bird-brained; she&#8217;s ape-brained&#8211;<em>as are the rest of us</em>. Like most products of evolution, the human mind is a messy kluge that uses quick and dirty heuristics. We are no more natural skeptics than we are natural mathematicians. That doesn&#8217;t make Lindsey an idiot; it just makes her unpracticed.</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t tell the difference between being unpracticed and being a moron, what does that make you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spork</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/09/23/thoughts-on-the-recent-mormon-posts/comment-page-2/#comment-230666</link>
		<dc:creator>Spork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4778#comment-230666</guid>
		<description>I do not separate religious belief from other aspects of rational, or critical, thinking.

In order to live with the cognitive dissonance of believing in magic rocks and magic underpants and that native Americans descended from the populations of the Middle East, one must shut off a part of one&#039;s thinking process.  The process of which I speak is the one used to analyze data and reach conclusions based on evidence and the application of reason and logic.

When one shuts off such a significant process, one becomes vulnerable to such foolishness as believing in magic underpants, that the Earth is only 6,000 years old, that science is evil, that evolution didn&#039;t happen, and that one must simply believe what one&#039;s cult authorities have instructed one to believe.

Once such a basic part of human reason is deactivated in the human mind, that mind is made less.  It is made stupid, moronic, dumber than a sweater on a cat.

Lindsey has shut off that part of her mind and believes in magic underpants.

Just think about that for a moment.  

Magic underpants. 

Now, magic rocks are bad enough, but they appeal to the moron&#039;s desire for talismanic magic, and to have a focus for magic in tangible objects.  

But...magic underpants?  That aren&#039;t even very comfortable in the first place?

She has shut off the part of her mind needed to examine evidence and apply logic.  She no longer thinks critically.  People who refuse, not those who can&#039;t such as the mentally disabled, but those who flat-out &lt;em&gt;refuse&lt;/em&gt; to think critically are, in fact, willfully stupid.  They wallow in it.

I asked her how she could believe in a religion founded by a guy with magic glasses.  Her response was a tautological fallacy about the book of Mormon.  That&#039;s it!  That&#039;s all she had to offer!  No critical thoughts about it.  No personal examination of motive.  Just regurgitating the same pablum she&#039;s been having crammed into her head by her favorite cult leaders.

So, yes.  Lindsey is a moron, an idiot, a stupid jackasss, thick-skulled maroon.  There is no room for any other conclusion here.  She&#039;s a moron, and that is a direct result of her willful disregard for the facts of physical evidence (and the lack thereof) and a refusal to simply &lt;em&gt;think&lt;/em&gt;.  

A moron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not separate religious belief from other aspects of rational, or critical, thinking.</p>
<p>In order to live with the cognitive dissonance of believing in magic rocks and magic underpants and that native Americans descended from the populations of the Middle East, one must shut off a part of one&#8217;s thinking process.  The process of which I speak is the one used to analyze data and reach conclusions based on evidence and the application of reason and logic.</p>
<p>When one shuts off such a significant process, one becomes vulnerable to such foolishness as believing in magic underpants, that the Earth is only 6,000 years old, that science is evil, that evolution didn&#8217;t happen, and that one must simply believe what one&#8217;s cult authorities have instructed one to believe.</p>
<p>Once such a basic part of human reason is deactivated in the human mind, that mind is made less.  It is made stupid, moronic, dumber than a sweater on a cat.</p>
<p>Lindsey has shut off that part of her mind and believes in magic underpants.</p>
<p>Just think about that for a moment.  </p>
<p>Magic underpants. </p>
<p>Now, magic rocks are bad enough, but they appeal to the moron&#8217;s desire for talismanic magic, and to have a focus for magic in tangible objects.  </p>
<p>But&#8230;magic underpants?  That aren&#8217;t even very comfortable in the first place?</p>
<p>She has shut off the part of her mind needed to examine evidence and apply logic.  She no longer thinks critically.  People who refuse, not those who can&#8217;t such as the mentally disabled, but those who flat-out <em>refuse</em> to think critically are, in fact, willfully stupid.  They wallow in it.</p>
<p>I asked her how she could believe in a religion founded by a guy with magic glasses.  Her response was a tautological fallacy about the book of Mormon.  That&#8217;s it!  That&#8217;s all she had to offer!  No critical thoughts about it.  No personal examination of motive.  Just regurgitating the same pablum she&#8217;s been having crammed into her head by her favorite cult leaders.</p>
<p>So, yes.  Lindsey is a moron, an idiot, a stupid jackasss, thick-skulled maroon.  There is no room for any other conclusion here.  She&#8217;s a moron, and that is a direct result of her willful disregard for the facts of physical evidence (and the lack thereof) and a refusal to simply <em>think</em>.  </p>
<p>A moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aj</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/09/23/thoughts-on-the-recent-mormon-posts/comment-page-2/#comment-230651</link>
		<dc:creator>Aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4778#comment-230651</guid>
		<description>J. J. Ramsey,

&lt;blockquote&gt;And I never argued the “mean first” line, but rather that Lindsey’s invective wasn’t as overblown as tinyfrog’s or Spork’s–especially not Spork’s.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

When you said that they &quot;earned&quot; it, since by the same logic they&#039;re also not necessarily stupid, I thought you were justifying Linsey&#039;s outbursts on some kind of retaliatory principle.

&lt;blockquote&gt; This isn’t about coddling irrational beliefs, but about responding to irrationality with more irrationality. I have no quarrel with those who have argued with Lindsey’s beliefs like adults, or more to the point, like honest skeptics, pointing out the flaws in her claims without overreaching and making unsupportable claims about her overall intellect.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Perhaps not with you, but the rest selectively withhold judgement on similar cases when &quot;overreaching&quot; occurs pointed towards someone or a group they don&#039;t like, sometimes coming from themselves. Generalized jokes aside, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s right to call religious individual morons, unless it&#039;s for their general behaviour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J. J. Ramsey,</p>
<blockquote><p>And I never argued the “mean first” line, but rather that Lindsey’s invective wasn’t as overblown as tinyfrog’s or Spork’s–especially not Spork’s.</p></blockquote>
<p>When you said that they &#8220;earned&#8221; it, since by the same logic they&#8217;re also not necessarily stupid, I thought you were justifying Linsey&#8217;s outbursts on some kind of retaliatory principle.</p>
<blockquote><p> This isn’t about coddling irrational beliefs, but about responding to irrationality with more irrationality. I have no quarrel with those who have argued with Lindsey’s beliefs like adults, or more to the point, like honest skeptics, pointing out the flaws in her claims without overreaching and making unsupportable claims about her overall intellect.</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps not with you, but the rest selectively withhold judgement on similar cases when &#8220;overreaching&#8221; occurs pointed towards someone or a group they don&#8217;t like, sometimes coming from themselves. Generalized jokes aside, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s right to call religious individual morons, unless it&#8217;s for their general behaviour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. J. Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/09/23/thoughts-on-the-recent-mormon-posts/comment-page-2/#comment-230641</link>
		<dc:creator>J. J. Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/?p=4778#comment-230641</guid>
		<description>JohnB: &quot;I didn’t see this as so much a presumptuous statement&quot;

That wasn&#039;t the presumptuous bit that led to Lindsey saying that tinyfrog sounded like a &quot;judgemental moron.&quot; The presumptuous bit was tinyfrog saying that &quot;she will probably decide that Mormonism is right because atheists don’t like her or are &#039;mean&#039;.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JohnB: &#8220;I didn’t see this as so much a presumptuous statement&#8221;</p>
<p>That wasn&#8217;t the presumptuous bit that led to Lindsey saying that tinyfrog sounded like a &#8220;judgemental moron.&#8221; The presumptuous bit was tinyfrog saying that &#8220;she will probably decide that Mormonism is right because atheists don’t like her or are &#8216;mean&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
