Comments on: Reading Playboy for the Articles

By: martymankins

martymankins — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:18:50 +0000

Love the post title… and yes, I do read it for the articles. That was a good read. Nice to see a billboard like that in a major city.

By: Gabriel

Gabriel — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:34:08 +0000

There isn’t any other reason than the articles to read playboy. The naked chicks in it are weak. You can get better and more imaginative naked girls on the net for free. At least some of the articles and fiction in playboy are still good.

By: muffin

muffin — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:57:11 +0000

Boobs are a legitimate excuse for me! That article just gives me an extra reason to peruse the site!

By: The Science Pundit

The Science Pundit — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:36:00 +0000

I saw this on Sunday at our atheist meetup. Now I’m gonna have to hit the news stand and pick up a copy of the issue with Ms. Faris on the cover. (But I’m getting it because it has Steve Rade in it — I swear!) ;-P

By: News From Around The Blogosphere 8.25.08 « Skepacabra

News From Around The Blogosphere 8.25.08 « Skepacabra — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:56:56 +0000

[...] Article on atheist billboard in Playboy Magazine – I was fortunate enough to see an almost identical billboard on my commute to work every day on the New Jersey Turnpike for a few months last year. [...]

By: Craig

Craig — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:58:17 +0000

Wouldn’t want to offend the fundies, right!

By: Jim

Jim — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:54:11 +0000

t3knomanser: I guess they don’t put the nudity in the online preview. I was disappoin.. er, surprised by that as well.

By: t3knomanser

t3knomanser — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:55:18 +0000

Now, I haven’t flipped through a Playboy since I was a teenager, but isn’t it nothing but articles? I swear, I didn’t see a single naked woman in that magazine. Has it changed?

By: Agersomnia

Agersomnia — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:26:30 +0000

The title of your post, and your last two lines are priceless, Hemant. =)