Why’d it have to add a sentence of argumentation after each answer? What if I want to say “Yes, because I’m American and I don’t trust in a god,” or “No, it would cost too much to erase it from all those pennies”?
Unfortunately, it looks like the poll is 3 years old. Just below the results, there is a link asking you to return to the story, which is dated Nov. 18, 2005.
John: the reason is that people sent messages about this poll in Pharyngula (PZ Myers’ blog). This one, for example. And there were another message in another thread.
we’re losing again: 44-56
Do the people at RRS know about it?
Leave a Comment
Support the Secular Students!
Secular Student Alliance Member Todd Stiefel has agreed to match all donations to us by 12/21/2009 up to a total of $50,000. Double the value of your support and help us get the whole match by donating now.
I think a few of yall should comment on the Newsvine
http://opa1.newsvine.com/_news/2008/08/14/1749256-live-vote-should-in-god-we-trust-be-yanked#comments
Why’d it have to add a sentence of argumentation after each answer? What if I want to say “Yes, because I’m American and I don’t trust in a god,” or “No, it would cost too much to erase it from all those pennies”?
How does it feel to effectively command 140,000 people?
That is the change in the Yes vote since the first post, where as the No vote has hardly changed at all.
I told you guys that Hemant gets things done.
Unfortunately, it looks like the poll is 3 years old. Just below the results, there is a link asking you to return to the story, which is dated Nov. 18, 2005.
I am from the UK so perhaps I am just stupid. Can someone explain how this apparent change occurred in such a short time?
Man, there are some crazies on the Newsvine thread.
John: the reason is that people sent messages about this poll in Pharyngula (PZ Myers’ blog). This one, for example. And there were another message in another thread.
We’re losing again!
we’re losing again: 44-56
Do the people at RRS know about it?