<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Leviticus Challenge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/</link>
	<description>Atheism with Positivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:48:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: EKM</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-212475</link>
		<dc:creator>EKM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/#comment-212475</guid>
		<description>On July 28, 2008 at 3:23 pm Ed Hopkins said,
&lt;blockquote&gt;
I can understand the christian argument that Jesus’ coming changed the rules, but this surely just raises a much larger issue, one that if christians addressed in a proper logical fashion would surely cast huge doubts on their faith: If Father, Son and Holy Ghost are all one and Jesus’ coming changed the rules, then it meant that God changed his mind. Why would he change his mind unless this supposedly perfect being realised he got it wrong!!
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The explanation that I was given was that God wanted to have a relationship with humans, but he cannot stand sin. Hates it. (Let&#039;s leave aside the question as to why an infinite, perfect being would want, need or hate anything at all.) So he created the world, and gave Israelites the Law. But people kept sinning, so the J Man had to come and be crucified as a sacrifice to atone for the sins of the world. 

But I think this raises a few questions. God wants to have a relationship with people, and he hates sin. Yet he designed people in such a manner that knowing God is difficult, yet sinning is easy. (Plus a lot of people who claim to know God disagree with each other.Shouldn&#039;t an infinite, perfect being be able to explain himself to us in a way we understand unambiguously?) 

So God made people such that it is hard for humans to do the thing that God wants, and easy to do the thing that  God does not want. Is that intelligent design?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On July 28, 2008 at 3:23 pm Ed Hopkins said,</p>
<blockquote><p>
I can understand the christian argument that Jesus’ coming changed the rules, but this surely just raises a much larger issue, one that if christians addressed in a proper logical fashion would surely cast huge doubts on their faith: If Father, Son and Holy Ghost are all one and Jesus’ coming changed the rules, then it meant that God changed his mind. Why would he change his mind unless this supposedly perfect being realised he got it wrong!!
</p></blockquote>
<p>The explanation that I was given was that God wanted to have a relationship with humans, but he cannot stand sin. Hates it. (Let&#8217;s leave aside the question as to why an infinite, perfect being would want, need or hate anything at all.) So he created the world, and gave Israelites the Law. But people kept sinning, so the J Man had to come and be crucified as a sacrifice to atone for the sins of the world. </p>
<p>But I think this raises a few questions. God wants to have a relationship with people, and he hates sin. Yet he designed people in such a manner that knowing God is difficult, yet sinning is easy. (Plus a lot of people who claim to know God disagree with each other.Shouldn&#8217;t an infinite, perfect being be able to explain himself to us in a way we understand unambiguously?) </p>
<p>So God made people such that it is hard for humans to do the thing that God wants, and easy to do the thing that  God does not want. Is that intelligent design?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanie</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-211494</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/#comment-211494</guid>
		<description>OK if this debate is going to continue, someone needs to order up some scampi for me... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK if this debate is going to continue, someone needs to order up some scampi for me&#8230; <img src='http://friendlyatheist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cipher</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-211299</link>
		<dc:creator>cipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/#comment-211299</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Gentiles weren’t expected to observe them because they’re unloved and unwanted and observing dietary rules won’t help. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m not defending the OT, but that wasn&#039;t the reason. I don&#039;t know what you mean by &quot;help&quot; - the ancient Israelites weren&#039;t thinking in salvific terms in the way that Christians use the term.
&lt;blockquote&gt;
AFAIK, Jesus didn’t abrogate Levitical Laws, Paul did. If Christians want to go on about how rules don’t apply to them, they should once and for ever more shut up about the Ten Commandments.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What I meant is that Christians believe that Jesus&#039; coming abrogated those laws. But I agree about their ambiguous attitude toward the OT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Gentiles weren’t expected to observe them because they’re unloved and unwanted and observing dietary rules won’t help. </p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not defending the OT, but that wasn&#8217;t the reason. I don&#8217;t know what you mean by &#8220;help&#8221; &#8211; the ancient Israelites weren&#8217;t thinking in salvific terms in the way that Christians use the term.</p>
<blockquote><p>
AFAIK, Jesus didn’t abrogate Levitical Laws, Paul did. If Christians want to go on about how rules don’t apply to them, they should once and for ever more shut up about the Ten Commandments.</p></blockquote>
<p>What I meant is that Christians believe that Jesus&#8217; coming abrogated those laws. But I agree about their ambiguous attitude toward the OT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-211287</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/#comment-211287</guid>
		<description>Gentiles weren&#039;t expected to observe them because they&#039;re unloved and unwanted and observing dietary rules won&#039;t help.  It&#039;s the same reason why all religious rules only apply to believers.

The author of Leviticus wasn&#039;t addressing Christians because, shocker, there weren&#039;t any Christians.  And since Christians think the OT is a part of their bible describing their God, then yes, the rules given out by their God apply to them.

AFAIK, Jesus didn&#039;t abrogate Levitical Laws, Paul did.  If Christians want to go on about how rules don&#039;t apply to them, they should once and for ever more shut up about the Ten Commandments.  Since they clearly do not cut these ties to the OT, we&#039;re back to the original problem: Leviticus is in, or everything is out.  God isn&#039;t dealing out cafeteria rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gentiles weren&#8217;t expected to observe them because they&#8217;re unloved and unwanted and observing dietary rules won&#8217;t help.  It&#8217;s the same reason why all religious rules only apply to believers.</p>
<p>The author of Leviticus wasn&#8217;t addressing Christians because, shocker, there weren&#8217;t any Christians.  And since Christians think the OT is a part of their bible describing their God, then yes, the rules given out by their God apply to them.</p>
<p>AFAIK, Jesus didn&#8217;t abrogate Levitical Laws, Paul did.  If Christians want to go on about how rules don&#8217;t apply to them, they should once and for ever more shut up about the Ten Commandments.  Since they clearly do not cut these ties to the OT, we&#8217;re back to the original problem: Leviticus is in, or everything is out.  God isn&#8217;t dealing out cafeteria rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cipher</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-211275</link>
		<dc:creator>cipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/#comment-211275</guid>
		<description>The dietary laws and laws pertaining to ritual purity were meant specifically for Jews. Gentiles were (and are) not expected to observe them.

Now, as I mentioned earlier, if a Christian wants to argue that the church is the &quot;New Israel&quot; - that&#039;s another matter, but it&#039;s moot anyway, because they believe that Jesus abrogated the Levitical laws. In any case, that&#039;s bringing the NT into it. The author of Leviticus was addressing Jews solely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dietary laws and laws pertaining to ritual purity were meant specifically for Jews. Gentiles were (and are) not expected to observe them.</p>
<p>Now, as I mentioned earlier, if a Christian wants to argue that the church is the &#8220;New Israel&#8221; &#8211; that&#8217;s another matter, but it&#8217;s moot anyway, because they believe that Jesus abrogated the Levitical laws. In any case, that&#8217;s bringing the NT into it. The author of Leviticus was addressing Jews solely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-211250</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/#comment-211250</guid>
		<description>cipher,

&lt;blockquote&gt;Again – bear in mind that these rules were meant only for Jews.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

They were meant for people that God cares about.  These were only the Jews, but now that also includes Christians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cipher,</p>
<blockquote><p>Again – bear in mind that these rules were meant only for Jews.</p></blockquote>
<p>They were meant for people that God cares about.  These were only the Jews, but now that also includes Christians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cipher</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-211143</link>
		<dc:creator>cipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/#comment-211143</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ve always adored Leviticus for proving that fundie insanity is not a new crisis. There’s just so much fodder there since it’s the original Chick tract.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As fucked up as the Old Testament is, I&#039;d say you don&#039;t really get into Jack Chick territory until the New Testament. In the OT, if you did something God didn’t like, he’d kill you. If you really screwed up, he’d leave you alive but kill your family. In the NT, if he decides he doesn’t like you (for committing a heinous crime like not using the correct name when you &lt;strike&gt;kiss his ass&lt;/strike&gt; worship him), he bides his time until you die, then he goes postal worker on you. 

Lazarus and the rich man, the book of Revelation – &lt;em&gt;that’s &lt;/em&gt;Jack Chick.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Plus, I love starting up literal interpretation debates with Christian friends over seafood dinners…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Again – bear in mind that these rules were meant only for Jews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’ve always adored Leviticus for proving that fundie insanity is not a new crisis. There’s just so much fodder there since it’s the original Chick tract.</p></blockquote>
<p>As fucked up as the Old Testament is, I&#8217;d say you don&#8217;t really get into Jack Chick territory until the New Testament. In the OT, if you did something God didn’t like, he’d kill you. If you really screwed up, he’d leave you alive but kill your family. In the NT, if he decides he doesn’t like you (for committing a heinous crime like not using the correct name when you <strike>kiss his ass</strike> worship him), he bides his time until you die, then he goes postal worker on you. </p>
<p>Lazarus and the rich man, the book of Revelation – <em>that’s </em>Jack Chick.</p>
<blockquote><p>Plus, I love starting up literal interpretation debates with Christian friends over seafood dinners…</p></blockquote>
<p>Again – bear in mind that these rules were meant only for Jews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-211136</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/#comment-211136</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
stephanie said
...Plus, I love starting up literal interpretation debates with Christian friends over seafood dinners…
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

see &lt;a href=&quot;http://godhatesshrimp.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;godhatesshrimp.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
stephanie said<br />
&#8230;Plus, I love starting up literal interpretation debates with Christian friends over seafood dinners…
</p></blockquote>
<p>see <a href="http://godhatesshrimp.com" rel="nofollow">godhatesshrimp.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanie</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-211075</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/#comment-211075</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always adored Leviticus for proving that fundie insanity is not a new crisis. There&#039;s just so much fodder there since it&#039;s the original Chick tract. 
Plus, I love starting up literal interpretation debates with Christian friends over seafood dinners...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always adored Leviticus for proving that fundie insanity is not a new crisis. There&#8217;s just so much fodder there since it&#8217;s the original Chick tract.<br />
Plus, I love starting up literal interpretation debates with Christian friends over seafood dinners&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News From Around The Blogosphere 7.28.08 &#171; Skepacabra</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-211007</link>
		<dc:creator>News From Around The Blogosphere 7.28.08 &#171; Skepacabra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/28/the-leviticus-challenge/#comment-211007</guid>
		<description>[...] The Leviticus Challenge -Pastor Daniel Harrell of Boston’s Park Street Church decided to specifically follow the book (since it’s so often ignored in church) and have others do it with him. But what about all the stuff Leviticus is known for that talk about gays, avoiding women who menstruate, and animal sacrifices? Oh, they&#8217;re ignoring that part. Afterall, nobody expects someone who says they&#8217;re going to follow the entire book of Leviticus to actually follow the entire book of Leviticus. Don&#8217;t be silly. Have you read that thing? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Leviticus Challenge -Pastor Daniel Harrell of Boston’s Park Street Church decided to specifically follow the book (since it’s so often ignored in church) and have others do it with him. But what about all the stuff Leviticus is known for that talk about gays, avoiding women who menstruate, and animal sacrifices? Oh, they&#8217;re ignoring that part. Afterall, nobody expects someone who says they&#8217;re going to follow the entire book of Leviticus to actually follow the entire book of Leviticus. Don&#8217;t be silly. Have you read that thing? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
