Comments on: Return of the Crocoduck http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/ Atheism with Positivity Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:17:25 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Metro http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/comment-page-1/#comment-197848 Metro Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:38:55 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/#comment-197848 I wish you'd warned us he was on O'Falafelhead's show. I almost tore out one of my eyes before I was able to get control. My favourite moment was the part where Cameron says "God exists. It'a no-brainer ..." At which point I thought "Well you got <em>that</em> right at least." I wish you’d warned us he was on O’Falafelhead’s show. I almost tore out one of my eyes before I was able to get control.

My favourite moment was the part where Cameron says “God exists. It’a no-brainer …”

At which point I thought “Well you got that right at least.”

]]> By: Vincent http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/comment-page-1/#comment-197130 Vincent Sun, 06 Jul 2008 17:23:45 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/#comment-197130 Yeah, he's got to sell plushy crocoducks. Yeah, he’s got to sell plushy crocoducks.

]]> By: Akheloios http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/comment-page-1/#comment-196707 Akheloios Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:27:58 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/#comment-196707 It's cute and I want one! It’s cute and I want one!

]]> By: Mythprogrammer http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/comment-page-1/#comment-196703 Mythprogrammer Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:19:29 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/#comment-196703 Already emailed him to see if he wanted help programming the site :P Already emailed him to see if he wanted help programming the site :P

]]> By: Darryl http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/comment-page-1/#comment-196680 Darryl Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:20:49 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/#comment-196680 Where does a guy go after the crocoduck? I mean, if you go back on this stuff you look like an idiot, and if you go further you look like an idiot. Sooner or later he's going to be majorly discredited, and then what? He's relatively young; that means he could be a laughing-stock for decades. Sad way to end a public career--being remembered for the crocoduck. I do think the creature is kinda cute though. Where does a guy go after the crocoduck? I mean, if you go back on this stuff you look like an idiot, and if you go further you look like an idiot. Sooner or later he’s going to be majorly discredited, and then what? He’s relatively young; that means he could be a laughing-stock for decades. Sad way to end a public career–being remembered for the crocoduck.

I do think the creature is kinda cute though.

]]> By: k3vin http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/comment-page-1/#comment-196665 k3vin Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:56:10 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/#comment-196665 Aw, man. Next time Ray Comfort or Kirk Cameron spits out another nonsensical argument I need to snatch up the domain for it... Anyhow, good luck to the owner. My small advice is to keep it simple. Make a FAQ. Give an email that people can sent questions, comments or suggestions (not your personal email. Again, keep it simple. Just lay out what the arguments are, what reason, if any, they have for their argument and then proceed to explain what merits the argument has (if any) and why it's completely wrong. :D @Wes: I cringed when O'rly said that he won the argument because Richard Hawkins couldn't explain everything. I was almost shouting "HOW DID GOD MAKE IT?!!?!" at my screen. Non-answers are not answers. Aw, man. Next time Ray Comfort or Kirk Cameron spits out another nonsensical argument I need to snatch up the domain for it… Anyhow, good luck to the owner. My small advice is to keep it simple. Make a FAQ. Give an email that people can sent questions, comments or suggestions (not your personal email. Again, keep it simple. Just lay out what the arguments are, what reason, if any, they have for their argument and then proceed to explain what merits the argument has (if any) and why it’s completely wrong. :D

@Wes: I cringed when O’rly said that he won the argument because Richard Hawkins couldn’t explain everything. I was almost shouting “HOW DID GOD MAKE IT?!!?!” at my screen. Non-answers are not answers.

]]> By: Ken McKnight http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/comment-page-1/#comment-196611 Ken McKnight Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:53:16 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/#comment-196611 The animal is clearly misnamed. I recognized it immediately as the creationists' favorite symbol, the Crocoshit. The animal is clearly misnamed. I recognized it immediately as the creationists’ favorite symbol, the Crocoshit.

]]> By: Mark http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/comment-page-1/#comment-196601 Mark Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:28:43 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/#comment-196601 Absolutely BRILLIANT idea to snatch up that domain. I gotta think about this! Thanks! Absolutely BRILLIANT idea to snatch up that domain.

I gotta think about this! Thanks!

]]> By: Wes http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/comment-page-1/#comment-196583 Wes Sat, 05 Jul 2008 18:31:53 +0000 http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/07/05/return-of-the-crocoduck/#comment-196583 So much ridiculousness in that interview. Bill O'Reilly claims he "won" his "debate" with Dawkins? That would be the "debate" in which O'Reilly said, "There's 24 hours in a day. That's science." or something to that effect, and which, if I recall, wasn't even set up as a "debate" at all, but as an interview. The fact that FOX is bringing on people like Cameron and Stephen Baldwin as political commentators says a lot about the level of political discourse on that station. The lowest common denominator just keeps getting lower. So much ridiculousness in that interview.

Bill O’Reilly claims he “won” his “debate” with Dawkins? That would be the “debate” in which O’Reilly said, “There’s 24 hours in a day. That’s science.” or something to that effect, and which, if I recall, wasn’t even set up as a “debate” at all, but as an interview.

The fact that FOX is bringing on people like Cameron and Stephen Baldwin as political commentators says a lot about the level of political discourse on that station. The lowest common denominator just keeps getting lower.

]]>