<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Dawkins on Real Time with Bill Maher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/</link>
	<description>Atheism with Positivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:50:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Snakes Talking! (FSTDT wins again) &#124; Heathenz</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/comment-page-1/#comment-183273</link>
		<dc:creator>Snakes Talking! (FSTDT wins again) &#124; Heathenz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/#comment-183273</guid>
		<description>[...] Friendly Atheist [FSTDT Link] [2008-Apr-19] We believe in talking birds (African Grey Parrot). Why is a talking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friendly Atheist [FSTDT Link] [2008-Apr-19] We believe in talking birds (African Grey Parrot). Why is a talking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorin</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/comment-page-1/#comment-179711</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/#comment-179711</guid>
		<description>I agree with Struby</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Struby</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Struby</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/comment-page-1/#comment-154787</link>
		<dc:creator>Struby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 06:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/#comment-154787</guid>
		<description>To CJ...

Snake species do not have vocal chords.  Please explain how they could possibly &#039;talk&#039; as you refer to the specific way in which parrots mimic speech without having any biological systems with which to properly intercourse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To CJ&#8230;</p>
<p>Snake species do not have vocal chords.  Please explain how they could possibly &#8216;talk&#8217; as you refer to the specific way in which parrots mimic speech without having any biological systems with which to properly intercourse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jeffers</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/comment-page-1/#comment-154453</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jeffers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/#comment-154453</guid>
		<description>&#039;I don’t think Dawkins is elitist&#039;

He&#039;s an Oxford professor, you&#039;d hope he would be. 

This is the thing ... Dawkins is a heavyweight academic, schooled in the English education system. When he&#039;s arguing with someone, he&#039;s going to have the courtesy to bring facts and logic and reasoning and authority to the table - if someone debating him doesn&#039;t have the courtesy to even define terms, it&#039;s going to look like steamrolling. 

He&#039;s not *arrogant*, he&#039;s *right*. If you disagree with that, explain how he&#039;s wrong, and explain how using words that mean what words normally mean and worked counterexamples. If you can&#039;t, don&#039;t be surprised if you look and are treated like an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;I don’t think Dawkins is elitist&#8217;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s an Oxford professor, you&#8217;d hope he would be. </p>
<p>This is the thing &#8230; Dawkins is a heavyweight academic, schooled in the English education system. When he&#8217;s arguing with someone, he&#8217;s going to have the courtesy to bring facts and logic and reasoning and authority to the table &#8211; if someone debating him doesn&#8217;t have the courtesy to even define terms, it&#8217;s going to look like steamrolling. </p>
<p>He&#8217;s not *arrogant*, he&#8217;s *right*. If you disagree with that, explain how he&#8217;s wrong, and explain how using words that mean what words normally mean and worked counterexamples. If you can&#8217;t, don&#8217;t be surprised if you look and are treated like an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monica Eastin</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/comment-page-1/#comment-153841</link>
		<dc:creator>Monica Eastin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/#comment-153841</guid>
		<description>I saw the interview. Thanks for posting the clip.

And I love the Dawkins analogy on &quot;imaginary friends.&quot; Isn&#039;t that so poignant? That is my new anti-religion slogan, &quot;I don&#039;t expect you to play with my imaginary friends, why must you insist I play with yours?&quot; I&#039;m always looking for a quick way to sum up the lunacy of insisting someone ELSE adopt your supernatural belief system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the interview. Thanks for posting the clip.</p>
<p>And I love the Dawkins analogy on &#8220;imaginary friends.&#8221; Isn&#8217;t that so poignant? That is my new anti-religion slogan, &#8220;I don&#8217;t expect you to play with my imaginary friends, why must you insist I play with yours?&#8221; I&#8217;m always looking for a quick way to sum up the lunacy of insisting someone ELSE adopt your supernatural belief system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/comment-page-1/#comment-153324</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/#comment-153324</guid>
		<description>We believe in talking birds (African Grey Parrot).  Why is a talking snake such a stretch?  We have evidence of an animal that speaks today, yet no one can prove that snakes have never spoken.  It all seems so silly.  If atheist want to label faith as fantasy, perhaps they should pick better examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We believe in talking birds (African Grey Parrot).  Why is a talking snake such a stretch?  We have evidence of an animal that speaks today, yet no one can prove that snakes have never spoken.  It all seems so silly.  If atheist want to label faith as fantasy, perhaps they should pick better examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/comment-page-1/#comment-152261</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/#comment-152261</guid>
		<description>It was really Maher who said that Collins believed in the talking snake, and all Dawkins said was, &quot;IF that is true, then he goes right down in my estimation.  He is not a bright guy.&quot;

The if clause there is important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was really Maher who said that Collins believed in the talking snake, and all Dawkins said was, &#8220;IF that is true, then he goes right down in my estimation.  He is not a bright guy.&#8221;</p>
<p>The if clause there is important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. J. Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/comment-page-1/#comment-152171</link>
		<dc:creator>J. J. Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/#comment-152171</guid>
		<description>Hemant Mehta: &quot;Dawkins knows full well that Collins is an Evangelical Christian.&quot;

Yet a little after four minutes and fourteen seconds into the interview, Dawkins said of Collins, &quot;Maybe he believes in some kind of God. Maybe he even believes in Jesus Christ.&quot; There&#039;s be no reason for those maybes if Dawkins had recalled that Collins was an Evangelical Christian. Perhaps Dawkins&#039; memory of his debate with Collins was fuzzy, but in any case, he did not show in the interview that he knew that Collins was a Christian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hemant Mehta: &#8220;Dawkins knows full well that Collins is an Evangelical Christian.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yet a little after four minutes and fourteen seconds into the interview, Dawkins said of Collins, &#8220;Maybe he believes in some kind of God. Maybe he even believes in Jesus Christ.&#8221; There&#8217;s be no reason for those maybes if Dawkins had recalled that Collins was an Evangelical Christian. Perhaps Dawkins&#8217; memory of his debate with Collins was fuzzy, but in any case, he did not show in the interview that he knew that Collins was a Christian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hemant Mehta</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/comment-page-1/#comment-152112</link>
		<dc:creator>Hemant Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/#comment-152112</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;but Dawkins seemed to not even know that Collins was a Christian.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s not true... Dawkins knows full well that Collins is an Evangelical Christian.  Their names graced the cover of Time magazine because &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1553986-1,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;they debated&lt;/a&gt; on the existence of God.  Several times, Collins&#039; Christianity was brought up.  

I think Dawkins thought his Christianity was limited to saying God created us via evolution... Dawkins didn&#039;t think Collins believed in Genesis literally.  And when Maher mentioned it, Dawkins was taken aback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>but Dawkins seemed to not even know that Collins was a Christian.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s not true&#8230; Dawkins knows full well that Collins is an Evangelical Christian.  Their names graced the cover of Time magazine because <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1553986-1,00.html" rel="nofollow">they debated</a> on the existence of God.  Several times, Collins&#8217; Christianity was brought up.  </p>
<p>I think Dawkins thought his Christianity was limited to saying God created us via evolution&#8230; Dawkins didn&#8217;t think Collins believed in Genesis literally.  And when Maher mentioned it, Dawkins was taken aback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. J. Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/comment-page-1/#comment-152073</link>
		<dc:creator>J. J. Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/04/12/richard-dawkins-on-real-time-with-bill-maher/#comment-152073</guid>
		<description>writerdd: &quot;Watched the show last night. Dawkins says right out that Collins doesn’t believe in the talking snake&quot;

I finished watching the show a few minutes ago (and after Maher&#039;s comments about girls&#039; bullying it may be the last time I watch his show), and Dawkins appeared to change his mind about whether Collins believes in the &quot;talking snake&quot; after Maher told him that Collins did believe it. I rewatched the interview from the clip, and not only did I not hear him refer to Collins&#039; book, but Dawkins seemed to not even know that Collins was a Christian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>writerdd: &#8220;Watched the show last night. Dawkins says right out that Collins doesn’t believe in the talking snake&#8221;</p>
<p>I finished watching the show a few minutes ago (and after Maher&#8217;s comments about girls&#8217; bullying it may be the last time I watch his show), and Dawkins appeared to change his mind about whether Collins believes in the &#8220;talking snake&#8221; after Maher told him that Collins did believe it. I rewatched the interview from the clip, and not only did I not hear him refer to Collins&#8217; book, but Dawkins seemed to not even know that Collins was a Christian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
