04.01.08
Posted in General, Mike Clawson at 10:43 pm by Mike Clawson
Hemant posted briefly on this back in October, but I thought I’d expand on it a little.
From the Church of Google website:
We at the Church of Google believe the search engine Google is the closest humankind has ever come to directly experiencing an actual God (as typically defined). We believe there is much more evidence in favor of Google’s divinity than there is for the divinity of other more traditional gods.
We reject supernatural gods on the notion they are not scientifically provable. Thus, Googlists believe Google should rightfully be given the title of “God”, as She exhibits a great many of the characteristics traditionally associated with such Deities in a scientifically provable manner.
They offer nine proofs that Google is God:
» PROOF #1 – Google is the closest thing to an Omniscient (all-knowing) entity in existence, which can be scientifically verified.
» PROOF #2 – Google is everywhere at once (Omnipresent).
» PROOF #3 – Google answers prayers.
» PROOF #4 – Google is potentially immortal.
» PROOF #5 – Google is infinite.
» PROOF #6 – Google remembers all.
» PROOF #7 – Google can “do no evil” (Omnibenevolent).
» PROOF #8 - According to Google trends, the term “Google” is searched for more than the terms “God”, “Jesus”, “Allah”, “Buddha”, “Christianity”, “Islam”, “Buddhism” and “Judaism” combined.
» PROOF #9 – Evidence of Google’s existence is abundant.
This ought to be enough to convince even the most determined skeptic, yes? 
Permalink ~
Posted in General at 8:00 pm by Hemant Mehta
Not atheism related.
But is this how my students feel?
It’s math!
Geometry proofs? Challenging and fulfilling.
Finding the area under a curve? A great way to spend the weekend.
Simplifying polynomials? Makes for a great first date.
Ok, so maybe I go a bit overboard…
(via Lindsey’s Rantings)
Permalink ~
Posted in General at 4:00 pm by Hemant Mehta
Last year, there was a story about how Bible Park USA was going to open in Murfreesboro, TN.
What sort of attractions would this theme park have?
- The Bible Land Fly-Through indoor ride that boasts the newest generation of IMAX-like technology with surround imagery; The Exodus Experience, an indoor experience featuring the parting of the Red Sea with high-tech standing 25-foot waves and image projection.
- An entire teen area with an enclosed ride, coffee house and retail offerings; a state-of-the-art recording studio where teen choirs and church choirs will be invited to record; A recreation of Noah’s Ark and a play where animals from the Ark will act; gathering places for youth groups and Bible study groups where they will be surrounded by the full text of the New Testament inscribed on a stone wall.
Not surprisingly, it’s still controversial. And not just because it distorts reality.
The board will hold a public hearing Wednesday on a proposal to use $27.9 million in property tax dollars to pay off bonds to finance the park.
That money would be generated over the next 22 years by the 282-acre Bible Park and businesses on more than 450 acres of adjacent property in the Blackman community.
…
[Board Chairman James] Baker couldn’t say if the board will vote on the [tax-increment financing] on Wednesday or defer it for further research. And final approval of the deal would be up to the county commission.
A zoning request to allow for the park is also working its way through county committees and could be voted on by the Rutherford County Commission as early as May 15.
Tax money to fund a Bible theme park. Why aren’t more people making a fuss about this?
At least there are local opponents to the whole deal:
[Park opponent John L.] Batey will join other opponents at an anti-park rally Saturday at the Blackman Community Center in advance of upcoming public meetings for approval of zoning and financing next week and potentially a deciding vote by the County Commission in May.
We don’t need another way to warp the minds of children. We certainly shouldn’t be doing it under the guide of a theme park. At the very least, this sort of garbage should be privately funded.
We can also look at it in practical terms. The projections for attendance is vastly overstated, according to the articles. It’ll hurt the community financially. Voting for the park is going against their best interests.
Hopefully, they’ll see that.
(via The Asian Atheist)
[tags]atheist, atheism[/tags]
Permalink ~
Posted in General at 1:00 pm by Hemant Mehta
Since the eBay book came out, there’s been talk with the publishers of what possible options there were for a second book.
It wouldn’t really be a follow-up (in other words, I Resold My Soul on eBay is *not* happening), but it would continue the idea of the atheist and Christian worlds intertwining.
I don’t think it’s going to happen.
Not right now.
Not because there weren’t ideas, though.
In fact, there were a number of rejected proposals. Some were just ideas. Some went as far along in the process as they could go before being passed over.
Time for a game.
Let’s see if you can figure out which ideas were actually pitched but later rejected:
- A book that features a conversation between myself and a conservative/fundamentalist Christian (such as Lee Strobel, author of The Case for Faith and other books).
- A book that discusses various aspects of religion/atheism with celebrities in the Christian world like Francis Collins, Stephen Baldwin, and (possibly) Ann Coulter.
- A book in which I document the world of a street preacher. I would try to be a proselytizer. I would set up shop in a public city and keep track of how many people took the time to talk to me. I would try to win people over for Christ… before revealing my ulterior motive. Can anyone preach? Will anyone actually listen to me?
- A book in which I am given control of an old, unattended church and attempt to preach secular messages to a wide audience. Can I attain a following? Are people as interested in a secular message as they are in a Biblical one? Is it possible to raise money for an endeavor like this?
- A book about how it’s not the Pat Robertsons and Jerry Falwells of the world who turn people off to Christianity. It’s your neighbors, co-workers, and friends who take care of that by acting hypocritical, being intolerant, or putting faith above friendship.
- A book in which I discuss the intimate details of my weekly dates with 52 different Christian women. Will they storm out of the restaurant when they find out I’m an atheist? Are they really as virtuous as they might claim to be? Does abstinence-only sex education work in practice?!
- A book in which I end up volunteering with Campus Crusade for Christ (with their approval) and finding out how different it is from my world of the Secular Student Alliance. What lessons can atheists learn from their Christian counterparts on campus? Why are there so many different Christian groups on any one campus? Why are so many students turned off by what CCC does?
- A book in which I live for ten weeks with a home-schooling, Christian family of ten. Mom is a lawyer who stays at home with the kids. Dad is a Creationist professor who teaches evolution (because he must) at a secular college. Is home-schooling brainwashing these kids? Can the kids learn to think critically about what they learn? Can they live with an atheist (and vice-versa)?
- A book that documents my experience at several different Christian Bible camps. What happens when an atheist gets to speak to the children each morning? Which aspects of camp would appeal to secular camp-goers? What really goes on behind those cabins at night when the coast seems clear…?
- A book in which I bone up on my Bible knowledge and try to lead a team from a local church to the Bible Bowl championships. Do atheists know more about the Bible than Christians? How will teams feel if they lose to an atheist? Is there trash talking at an event like this?
Need a hint: Five are real (ultimately rejected) proposals. Five are fake.
Good luck!
***
Update: Here’s the list of real (but rejected) proposals with a bit of backstory behind them:
1 — This idea didn’t appeal to me as much as others did because we’ve seen this type of book before. Not to mention I’m not as well-educated on matters of theology and biology as other atheists. There are some Christians I’d like to do this with, but I think in those cases we’d end up agreeing on far more issues than now, and there would be little tension.
2 — I really did like this idea since it would focus more on the practical aspects of religion (When is it ok to pray? Can you date someone of another faith?) instead of theology. But ultimately, the powers-that-be felt the names we had in mind wouldn’t draw in the big sales and there was no guarantee anything “revealing” would be said by them. Not unless certain people (e.g. Ann Coulter) were included on the list… and those additions weren’t very appealing.
5 — I still think this is an interesting concept. But it’s easy to argue Christians wouldn’t want to read what an atheist has to say about this topic.
6 — Hehehe. This is my favorite. What was the objection to this? Not the concept itself, but rather that the publishers didn’t think there would be much drama. In their minds, the girls would say “You’re an atheist? Interesting. Let’s talk” instead of running away screaming that I was Satan. And that wouldn’t be nearly as interesting.
8 — This was a possibility. My editor and I even met with the family. They were unbelievably nice and really interesting people. Ultimately, I thought I’d have a hard time criticizing a family I would come to know very well. And if I couldn’t be honest and objective, this wouldn’t work. That’s not the entire story, but it’s the main reason this idea didn’t work.
[tags]atheist, atheism[/tags]
Permalink ~
Posted in General at 8:00 am by Hemant Mehta
How do you reply to the %$&#holes who say this:
It’s April 1st.
Happy National Atheist’s Day!
Get it?
Get it…?!
*Hemant raises his fist*
No, wait. Violence won’t do it.
A snarky response might.
I just can’t think of one.
[tags]atheist, atheism[/tags]
Permalink ~
Posted in General at 7:00 am by Hemant Mehta
But this story is still disturbing.
Nearly a third of the inmates in the Creek County Jail were baptized Thursday night in a corrugated steel horse trough set up in the jail’s kitchen.
…
Seventy men and 12 women were baptized Wednesday, the second time baptisms have occurred in the new jail, which opened nearly three years ago.
The Rev. Luis Torres, chaplain of the Creek County Jail and pastor of the First Assembly of God in Sand Springs, said a baptism was held in the old jail six years earlier.
He attributed the high number of baptisms to the work of the 75-some volunteers who lead worship and teach Bible studies at the jail and to convicted inmates’ realization that they soon will leave the jail for hard time in prison.
“And,” he said, “in the last four years, there’s been a surge of the move of God, a revival. Inmates that have found the Lord are telling other inmates about it.”
Inmates are not allowed to be baptized until they have gone through an orientation, with teaching about the meaning of baptism, and have “accepted the Lord Jesus Christ as their savior and want to follow him,” Torres said.
As far as I see, no government money is going into this. No one is forcibly baptised. If atheist volunteers wanted to go into the prison and talk to inmates about reason and evidence, they would probably be able to do so.
So why do I get a queasy feeling while reading this?
[tags]atheist, atheism[/tags]
Permalink ~
