<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atheist Version of a Chick Tract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/</link>
	<description>Atheism with Positivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:18:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Little to Add Here &#171; blueollie</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/comment-page-1/#comment-134927</link>
		<dc:creator>Little to Add Here &#171; blueollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/#comment-134927</guid>
		<description>[...] Bonus Humor Update: I couldn&#8217;t resist adding a link to this parody of the Old &#8220;Holy Joe&#8221; Bible tracts that have been around for decades; this is an atheist version. Hat tip to Friendly Atheist. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bonus Humor Update: I couldn&#8217;t resist adding a link to this parody of the Old &#8220;Holy Joe&#8221; Bible tracts that have been around for decades; this is an atheist version. Hat tip to Friendly Atheist. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Division by Zer0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Chick Tracts defiled</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/comment-page-1/#comment-134846</link>
		<dc:creator>A Division by Zer0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Chick Tracts defiled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/#comment-134846</guid>
		<description>[...] Found at the Friendly Atheist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Found at the Friendly Atheist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/comment-page-1/#comment-134806</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/#comment-134806</guid>
		<description>That was stupid, IMO. I can see the potential for a clever parody, but the shitting in the shoes, the ninja references, the fake Dawkins quotes, etcetera was just juvenile and idiotic—not witty at all. Sorry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was stupid, IMO. I can see the potential for a clever parody, but the shitting in the shoes, the ninja references, the fake Dawkins quotes, etcetera was just juvenile and idiotic—not witty at all. Sorry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smellincoffee</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/comment-page-1/#comment-134804</link>
		<dc:creator>smellincoffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/#comment-134804</guid>
		<description>Enter the Jabberwock has a running Jack Chick Tract commentary, updated a couple of times a month. Every update he or a guest dissector go through a Chick tract,  mocking  it and pointing out the BS.

http://www.enterthejabberwock.com/?cat=12</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enter the Jabberwock has a running Jack Chick Tract commentary, updated a couple of times a month. Every update he or a guest dissector go through a Chick tract,  mocking  it and pointing out the BS.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.enterthejabberwock.com/?cat=12" rel="nofollow">http://www.enterthejabberwock.com/?cat=12</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorry</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/comment-page-1/#comment-134778</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/#comment-134778</guid>
		<description>http://www.weirdcrap.com/chick/archive.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.weirdcrap.com/chick/archive.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.weirdcrap.com/chick/archive.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorry</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/comment-page-1/#comment-134777</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/#comment-134777</guid>
		<description>http://www.weirdcrap.com/chick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.weirdcrap.com/chick" rel="nofollow">http://www.weirdcrap.com/chick</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arkonbey</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/comment-page-1/#comment-134774</link>
		<dc:creator>Arkonbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/#comment-134774</guid>
		<description>JJ: I agree. Pretty much myself and the other atheists that I knew in the USCG  and know today, wouldn&#039;t be such jackasses as to retaliate like that.

Now that you mention it, it does confirm the atheist stereotype a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ: I agree. Pretty much myself and the other atheists that I knew in the USCG  and know today, wouldn&#8217;t be such jackasses as to retaliate like that.</p>
<p>Now that you mention it, it does confirm the atheist stereotype a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly Atheist » Atheist Version of a Chick Tract</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/comment-page-1/#comment-134764</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendly Atheist » Atheist Version of a Chick Tract</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/#comment-134764</guid>
		<description>[...] Friendly Atheist » Atheist Version of a Chick Tract [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friendly Atheist » Atheist Version of a Chick Tract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. J. Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/comment-page-1/#comment-134761</link>
		<dc:creator>J. J. Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/#comment-134761</guid>
		<description>&quot;Anyone know any other sites where atheist Chick Tract parodies exist?&quot;

Bronze Dog had this one: &lt;a href=&quot;http://rockstarramblings.blogspot.com/2006/03/image-dogtoring-1-christians-crusades.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Image Dogtoring #1: Christians &amp; Crusades&lt;/a&gt;

I like it much better than &quot;Unholy Joe.&quot; For one thing, none of the atheists in Bronze Dog&#039;s parody use army shoes and army food for a personal toilet. Also, Bronze Dog&#039;s parody doesn&#039;t use &lt;em&gt;The God Delusion&lt;/em&gt; as a sort of Scripture. If I were to show &quot;Unholy Joe&quot; to a Christian, it would tend to confirm said Christian&#039;s misapprehensions about atheists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anyone know any other sites where atheist Chick Tract parodies exist?&#8221;</p>
<p>Bronze Dog had this one: <a href="http://rockstarramblings.blogspot.com/2006/03/image-dogtoring-1-christians-crusades.html" rel="nofollow">Image Dogtoring #1: Christians &amp; Crusades</a></p>
<p>I like it much better than &#8220;Unholy Joe.&#8221; For one thing, none of the atheists in Bronze Dog&#8217;s parody use army shoes and army food for a personal toilet. Also, Bronze Dog&#8217;s parody doesn&#8217;t use <em>The God Delusion</em> as a sort of Scripture. If I were to show &#8220;Unholy Joe&#8221; to a Christian, it would tend to confirm said Christian&#8217;s misapprehensions about atheists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steelman</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/comment-page-1/#comment-134756</link>
		<dc:creator>Steelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/02/29/atheist-version-of-a-chick-tract/#comment-134756</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a Chick tract parody, by James Huber, that makes fun of Jack Chick himself:
http://www.jhuger.com/tract/dtr/index

There are more in the sidebar on the right.
Brilliant stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a Chick tract parody, by James Huber, that makes fun of Jack Chick himself:<br />
<a href="http://www.jhuger.com/tract/dtr/index" rel="nofollow">http://www.jhuger.com/tract/dtr/index</a></p>
<p>There are more in the sidebar on the right.<br />
Brilliant stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
