01.31.08

Bryan Pesta Sheds More Light on the Atheist MySpace Group

Posted in Friendly Atheist at 10:59 pm by Hemant Mehta

Bryan Pesta is the person who began the now-defunct Atheist and Agnostic Group on MySpace.

A story about the group’s deletion appeared in today’s edition of The Plain Dealer (Cleveland). (Thanks to reporter David Briggs for writing about it!)

In this comment, he explains his reasoning behind why he believes the shutting down of the group was a result of religious intolerance (I added in a few relevant links):

Hey all. It’s been an interesting day. I want to be as transparent as possible, and welcome skeptical inquiries about how I know Myspace deleted my group because of religious intolerance.

First, thanks much to Hemant for helping communicate all this, and featuring it in more than one of his blogs. Thanks also to the godless community, the response has been overwhelming, and I think I owe anyone who took time dealing with this some further elaboration.

I started the group in June 2004. In the summer of 2005, it was deleted most definitely because of complaints from “religious intolerants”. A myspace user group called the “christian crusaders” was responsible for getting many groups deleted back then (including a large pro-abortion group).

Their strategy was to scour myspace looking for profiles and groups they found offensive, and then mass complain to myspace customer service. CS at myspace is very much hit or miss. The crusaders simply kept sending emails til someone at myspace took action (a key I think to what happened recently).

It took 3 weeks or so, but eventually the group was restored. Tom Anderson himself (pre news corp) posted to the group saying “myspace doesn’t censor” and “if any thing happens to the group in the future, just send him an email” (if interested, check out whom Tom lists as his heros. I suspect he is at least agnostic, but I also suspect he doesn’t control his profile anymore, post newscorp).

All was fine til around thanksgiving 2007 (with April 2007 resulting in the group’s award from the SSA and Harvard’s Humanist Chaplain).

My profile which controls the group was hacked. I still have no idea how; if anyone wants to blame me for stupidly falling for a phishing scam, I probably am guilty, but I honestly don’t know how it happened.

The group was renamed jesus is love; 100s of regular users were banned (which oddly is permanent in a myspace group; cannot be undone, even by the group’s moderator). All our huge threads were deleted and the hacker was systematically deleting users from the group as well.

It stopped when my profile was deleted. Note that with my profile’s deletion, every single thread I ever made to my group got deleted as well.

This lead to the first round of requests to myspace to restore it (see an earlier blog here from Hemant for an example). It also led to the online petition which now has 600 sigs.

Sometime in mid december, I finally got someone sympathetic at Myspace to restore the group.

The problem was, all the regular users were still banned.

Once again I sent repeated requests to myspace asking if the users could be unbanned (the group was essentially dead; delete 100 or so regulars from any internet forum and guess what happens).

I got dozens if not 100 auto-reply emails from customer service. Finally, on 1/1/2008, I got a reply– I think– from a person. It said “thank you for this information; we are deleting the group”. Literally 5 minutes later, the group was gone.

Sorry for the book length explanation. I realize the evidence is circumstantial, but I think there are enough parts to establish a prima facie case of disparate treatment on myspace’s part (if interested in my argument regarding this, see my new myspace profile).

Add to this how myspace (post newscorp) reacted to the biggest christian group getting hacked and deleted, and I think I have a rational basis for the claims made in my press release. Note that very few “discrimination” cases will have a smoking gun. I doubt there is a “crush the heathens” internal memo that was circulated among myspace execs. Most cases of discrimination are established by what I’ve been calling “prima facie” evidence (I’m no lawyer, but see Mcdonnell Douglas Corp versus Green for an example of how this works). I think an agent of myspace (and therefore myspace) deleted the group for religious reasons and I think I have enough evidence to meet the legal test for disparate treatment.

So, there it is. I’ll glady answer questions people pose here, but give me some time. I’ve spent the whole day emailing, so excuse any babbling above. We all know there’s a difference between believing and knowing (please no atheist versus agnostic discussions here…:). I believe myspace deleted my group for religious reasons, but I don’t know it. I’d argue my belief is reasonable and rational, however.

For the one person still reading (thanks mom) myspace code is so weird that even though our group is deleted, it still exists in internet limbo. The threads are accessible, and if you know the html glitch, you can even post in the group. That said, it trully is deleted as a group. Here’s the back door link to the topics. Note the second pinned topic is the 2005 post by Tom Anderson (I hope the link doesn’t ruin the formatting….):

Link

Sincerely,

B



Technorati Tags: ,

Popularity: 1% [?]

That Looks Quite Circular…

Posted in Friendly Atheist at 9:16 pm by Hemant Mehta

break-the-cycle.jpg

Gotta break the cycle somewhere…

(via The Frame Problem)


Technorati Tags: , , ,

Popularity: 1% [?]

Complaints Against Penn & Teller’s Bullshit!

Posted in Friendly Atheist at 3:00 pm by Hemant Mehta

Thank you, Freedom of Information Act.

Governmentattic has a collection of complaints made to the FCC regarding Penn & Teller’s Bullshit!

It’s amazing how many people don’t know how to change the channel or can’t stand any form of criticism against their beliefs.

Here’s the PDF of the complaints.

These are my favorite pages:

Page 6 — It includes this comment by Catholic League president Bill Donohue: “In the 12 years that I have been president of the Catholic League, I have never witnessed a more vicious attack on Catholicism than what appeared this week on [the show].”

Funny. He called Chocolate Jesus “one of the worst assaults on Christian sensibilities ever.” Does he keep a list of the worst attacks somewhere?

Page 12 — He saw an online commercial for the show! The horror!

Page 21 — It includes the phrases, “Old black Martin Luther King loves watermelon and red ripple” and “Greedy Rabbi Gold steals his brother’s money and copulates with his brother’s wife.”

(via Reason)


Technorati Tags: ,

Popularity: 2% [?]

A Message Board

Posted in Friendly Atheist at 12:00 pm by Hemant Mehta

Unbrainwashed recently made a comment suggesting we ought to have a message board so that people who visit this site can carry on their own discussions. The upside to this is that the threads could last several days, as opposed to a blog posting, where discussions tend to be short-lived.

I don’t have enough knowledge about how to do this, but if anyone would like to shed some light on how it works, what software to use, costs, etc., please let me know! And if you’re willing to moderate it, that would be good to know as well :)

I’ll see if we can make this happen!


Technorati Tags: ,

Popularity: 3% [?]

Call for Secular Short Stories

Posted in Friendly Atheist at 7:00 am by Hemant Mehta

Lisa Swinehart is compiling a collection of “secular short stories” written by current and future leaders of the atheist/agnostic/Humanist/what-have-you movement.

Since many of you are popular bloggers who fit that description, you might already have a story that is perfect for this… or you’ve been waiting for just the right time to write it all down.

The short stories should be non-fiction and discuss challenges that the author has faced as a nonbeliever. Submissions should be no longer than 4,000 words (about 10 pages double-spaced, Times New Roman 12).

The proceeds of the book will go to the Secular Student Alliance (which I chair).

For more information, go here!


Technorati Tags: ,

Popularity: 1% [?]

01.30.08

A General Rule for Airline Pilots…

Posted in Friendly Atheist at 10:16 pm by Hemant Mehta

… Don’t go crazy and start screaming that you want to talk to God in the middle of a flight.

It scares people.

An Air Canada flight made an emergency landing in the Irish Republic after a pilot apparently suffered a breakdown.

A passenger said the pilot was carried from the plane shouting and swearing, saying he wanted to talk “to God”.

One of the passengers, Sean Finucane, said he saw the co-pilot being carried into the cabin in restraints.

“He was very, very distraught. He was yelling loudly at times,” he told the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

“He was swearing and asking for God and very distressed. He basically said he wanted to talk to God.”

(via New Humanist)


Technorati Tags: ,

Popularity: 1% [?]

What Julia Sweeney Has Learned Since Performing Her Atheist Monologue

Posted in Friendly Atheist at 3:00 pm by Hemant Mehta

Julia Sweeney, the former Saturday Night Live actress who now performs her one-woman show Letting Go of God, addressed the crowd at the Freedom From Religion Foundation convention in October.

Her remarks are hilarious. She presents them around the theme of what she has learned since she started performing her show.

You can download the audio here (MP3).

The transcript below is courtesy of Freethought Today

It’s lengthy, but well worth the read:

I want to just talk about the ten top things that I’ve learned about people since I started performing my show, “Letting Go of God.” I’ve been engaged in so many conversations with people. I get so many e-mails. A lot of people, you know, hate me, and are worried about God and all eternity and everything. But mostly I get fantastic letters from people who have gone through a similar experience.

First, I have to say Katha Pollitt is fantastic and I could have listened to her all night. I was laughing when Katha was talking about these virginity rings. What could be hotter for a teenager than sex while you’re wearing a virginity ring? That is the worst idea in the world! Omigod! Didn’t they learn anything from the Catholic girls in uniforms? It’s just so funny that they would think virginity rings would be a good idea and that it would keep teenagers from having sex.

I also think Katha’s really on to something about being culturally isolated in America and how that turns people toward the church. I think that is so potent, that idea, and so true.

But even my mother, who’s a practicing Catholic, is coming around. I’ve noticed you get a big reaction when you say you’re an atheist or that you don’t believe in God–at least from your quasi-religious or going-along-with-it family and friends. They hate you! It’s a big drama. They suddenly get much more religious. Now that it’s been a few years, it’s very interesting. Boy, now they don’t go to church every Sunday anymore.

I’ve really watched that with my mother. She told me about a friend of hers, whose daughter has two young kids, who had to move to some area in Washington state where she didn’t have any family and she has to work. My mother was saying, of course all positively: “And fortunately, there’s this church that takes the kids after school. They pick them up at school and take them to the church and they do homework with them and they feed them a snack and she can come pick them up at 5:15. Isn’t that so wonderful?”

Of course, I was horrified. But as a mother, I understand. Wow, how fantastic would that be if somebody picked your kid up and did homework with them and gave them snacks so that you could be at work? And yet it’s so insidious. Everybody thinks they’re doing such a good thing. I said to my mother, “Oh, you know, that really bothers me. Because I think while they’re doing homework they’re slipping in whatever religion this is.”

And even she didn’t know how to react. She said, “Yeah, but you know, that’s a good thing for her.” That’s true, and I understand it, but I just think that is where we need to turn our attention in the future.

OK. So here’s the ten things that have really come to the forefront for me, talking to so many people about religion.

Number one: People want to be good. People want to sacrifice for the common good. This is just part of our heritage as human beings.

I believe we have evolved to have this feeling. We all know how good it feels to help your neighbor do something or contribute, or make some self-sacrifice to do something. Everybody wants that feeling. This is where religion can sneak right in and hand this feeling over to people. All this good will that we’ve evolved to have can be just sucked up by an organization that is really doing things that are probably not for the greater common good. Yet they can deliver that hit to people of feeling like they’re doing something good.

For example, I just turned 48(!) and I’m still friends with about eight girlfriends in Spokane I’ve known since second grade, who are my age. Six are practicing Catholics, one is at the Universal Church and one converted to Judaism. But all of them do good things with their church, help build women’s shelters. They’re all involved. They all have that feeling.

When I talk to them about religion, they don’t say, “Oh, did I feel good yesterday thinking how Mary was a virgin and conceived Jesus!” They don’t say anything about Catholicism. They talk about the community work that they’ve done. And that’s what they connect with their church. They assign that good feeling to their church.

I just observe that over and over again. That wish to do good seems to be such a universal human trait and I think that religion does ill will with that.

Number two: The second thing I’ve noticed is a code of behavior is often necessary.

Katha kind of touched on this. People need 12-step programs. They need structure. I don’t like the whole higher power of the 12-step program. But just today, I got a letter saying, “I’m a physicist, I’m a scientist, I have 700 degrees and yet I know Jesus is the son of God because my life was a wreck and I couldn’t get out of bed. I accept Jesus as my personal savior and now I do these ten things and the proof is in the pudding. . . .”

As I say in my show, what William James said: “It doesn’t work because it’s true, it’s true because it works.”

Number three: The next thing I’ve noticed is: People want to be in a club.

We evolved and here we are. I’m very glad about my club with you! People need to be in a club. We evolved in groups of small tribes. They say that the average person has about 200 people in their address book because the tribes were around 200 people. That’s about how many people we can keep relationships straight with.

We like to feel affiliated. Obviously, there was an evolutionary advantage to us to have this feeling. I think religion, once again, in the absence of anything else, just swoops in.

In a way, in the last three years, even though I’ve completely rejected religion and I’ve done the show about how I rejected it, I’ve seen what works about religion. I’ve seen the underbelly of the beast. Because it does deliver. It makes people feel good. It gives them a code of behavior. And they’re in a club. And it’s easily identifiable.

I also agree with Katha that these things are changing. I think it’s an incredibly exciting time to be part of this group and all of these groups and people saying what they really think. But I also think that religion delivers those basic needs for people who don’t want to think too deeply about it.

I know, no big news to you, but for me, these are the things I’m turning over in my head.

Four: People love to hate.

People feel closer to other people if they have a common person they don’t like. Come on, everybody knows that’s true! And it’s true for us, too.

Religion delivers on that, too! It gives people an instant common enemy, whether it’s Islamic fundamentalists or secularists, that’s immediately there and provided. At Saturday Night Live, we were never closer than when Steven Seagal hosted–because we hated him so much! That was when I actually found out where everyone who was on staff lived in the city. I became close to everyone in our common hatred.

Religion provides that. I understand talking about how much we don’t like religious fundamentalists and they are so worthy of our hatred. But I try not to get too much into that. Because that’s so easy. That’s really delivering easy hits.

Five: The market does not like informed or skeptical citizens.

Advertisers and big companies that are short-term profit driven align themselves, consciously or unconsciously, with religion, because they both have common interests: keeping people needing things and not quite giving them what they need.

I really notice that over and over. To me, one of the creepiest things is this alignment between big business and conservative religion.

Six: I feel that bashing religion is more popular than understanding it, or even standing firm about your point of view without bashing. I think in the long term, understanding it is really the way to win.

Seven: Mostly, people are not introspective.

This has been a really profound realization for me. I was raised in Catholicism. I thought while everyone was praying they were thinking deeply about the hardest questions. Turns out that’s not true. I don’t think they are really thinking about anything. I don’t think–this is sad and maybe cynical–but I don’t think most people are very interested in why they do the things they do, and why they believe the things they believe. I know that makes me sort of a pessimist, but I came to this conclusion through thousands of e-mails and conversations.

Eight: Mostly people feel uncomfortable not knowing an answer.

Uncertainty is highly stressful. It’s undesirable. And religion provides answers. Science provides some answers, and those are often deeply unsettling and deeply humbling in a way that is very unnerving.

For example, to realize the universe doesn’t care about you specifically is a very difficult thing. When I think back to how I loved being a Catholic and I loved the nuns and the whole humility thing, I was kind of, “Oh, that’s so fantastic! I’m so humble, I’m so humble!” What could be more arrogant than thinking that there’s a god out there wondering if you’re performing the five offices of the day? That is arrogance taken to the extreme.

Nine: We’ve evolved our consciousness, I think, to have a great capacity to live in denial about things that make us feel uncomfortable.

I do this about a lot of things. I think we all have to admit that we do this, just not about religion. I stopped and looked at the uncomfortable answers with religion and I decided to go with the evidence. But there is some adaptive advantage to being maybe ridiculously optimistic about things or not really knowing, just going on faith. I think it’s not good, but we have to admit that we all do live in denial to some degree.

And I have a tenth observation. I even wrote this down. This is bad–I should not end on this, I should end on something good!

I wrote: Life is meaningless.

That is not good ad copy. What can I do about that? People say, “But then life’s meaningless!” Then I go into my song and dance: “But life is meaningful to me! And I have my meaningful life. Just being aware is so meaningful. Blah blah blah.”

And it’s true. I do feel that way. But that is a bitter pill to swallow. I don’t think everyone can swallow that pill. That maybe the universe isn’t so excited about these homo sapiens and has not been looking forward to our appearance all this time! That’s hard to admit.

Finally, I want to say three other things, and then I’ll be done.

The biggest, the greatest harm that religion did for me is that it quelled my natural wonder about the world. I didn’t really wonder about science. When I took chemistry, first of all it was boring the way they presented it and all the guys just wanted to make stink bombs. I didn’t think of it as being like cooking–I mean, I love to cook. If they’d presented it that way I would have been in. But I felt that there was this answer to everything. God gave us the 92 elements, or however many there are! Everyone knows the real answer: It’s God!

I feel so cheated by that. That’s why I wish I could sue the Catholic church. It’s not for whatever those priests were doing, it’s because I didn’t let my natural wondering continue, the thing that makes me the most human, the thing that makes me the most different from other species–my natural desire to know the answer. It cut that off for me. And I just think that is the most heinous thing that religion does.

I have a seven-year-old daughter. We went to the Atheists Alliance convention and I was on this great parenting panel. Everyone was talking about how they read a different myth from the world to their child every night. And I was thinking, “I can barely make dinner! My god, I’m so behind on the myths!”

So I have been trying to throw a myth in here and there. I was telling my daughter recently about Adam and Eve. I thought, OK, let’s just start with the basic stuff. So I was telling her, oh, there’s this story, and it’s about how the world began. It’s not how the world began, but it’s a story. There’s Adam and Eve and then there was this tree of knowledge and God said, “Don’t eat from the tree of knowledge.” Then the snake came to Eve and Eve went to Adam and before you knew it everyone was having apple pie. Then God came and was so mad about it and they had to leave the garden.

So Mulan goes, “Well, how did God know they were eating the fruit?” I said, “Oh, that’s a good question! I can’t remember.”

So just today I looked it up. Actually, it’s very interesting because God comes in and says, “Who was eating the fruit?”

Then Mulan said, “But God knows everything and there’re only two people.”

I love her questions.

Then we got into the thing about the other animals. Could they not eat the apple? Because we have an apple tree in our backyard and sometimes squirrels are eating them. Could no animals eat it? Only the people couldn’t eat it?

So I read that chapter of Genesis again. You know, I’ve gone through my whole story. I just knew vaguely what the Genesis story was. Then I took a bible study class. Then I was horrified by the bible. Then I read comparative religion. The story turns up here and there and everywhere. You can’t turn around without seeing that story somewhere in the world. But I just haven’t looked at it for a few years.

So today I read it again, and it is so beautiful. That story is so obviously about enlightenment. It is so obviously about human beings becoming aware that they’re conscious and they are going to die and that they are naked and that they can do good and bad to each other. Even when God says, “From now on, Adam, you have to eat from the soil, from your crops,” it’s such a beautiful story about us learning how to till the land and farming.

How did that beautiful story get so fucked up!

It’s such a great enlightenment story. It’s about saying goodbye to God. It’s about saying, “I’m eating the apple. And now I take the consequences of eating the apple. I know I’m going to die. And I know that I can do right and wrong. And I know I have to cooperate and have pain in childbirth. I’m aware of it. I’m not an animal that isn’t aware of those things.”

I was just arrested by the beauty of that. So I just wanted to share that.

My last story is about my daughter.

I didn’t know what to do about the Santa Claus thing. I start my show all about how I found out there was no Santa Claus, and how one thing just led to another. So then I became a mother and I really felt uncomfortable about lying to my daughter. I was very in conflict about how to handle Santa Claus because, of course, it’s fun and fantastic and great. I really do believe it’s a secular celebration and it’s part of our culture and I want to participate in that. On the other hand, it involves all this lying, and I really want my daughter to know that I would not lie to her. Maybe if the Nazis were coming and we were running away, under extreme circumstances I would lie, but not about Santa Claus. I just didn’t want to do that!

I was very uncomfortable so I didn’t tell her about Santa Claus for a really long time. Somehow she got to be three and a half without hearing about Santa, and then it was almost like she was too smart. ‘Cause I was going, “Well, there’s this guy. He’s going to come over when we’re asleep.”

She’s like, “What?!”

And I did not sell it. I was so half-assed: “Yes, he comes when we’re sleeping.”

She goes, “Well, I’m not going to sleep in my bed by myself when there’s somebody coming in the house!”

Then I go, “He leaves presents.”

And she’s like, “Um, how does he get in?”

And I go, “He comes down the chimney.”

And she goes, “WHAT?”

So we put out carrots for the reindeer and cookies. And I went and ate them. Omigod! Then I went in her room and I say, “Santa Claus was here.”

She goes, “I’m not going out there!”

It was horrifying.

So now she’s older. Finally she started picking up on stuff, like the tooth fairy. ‘Cause when we were in Iceland last year at the atheist conference she lost her tooth. We did this big elaborate ritual of putting the Icelandic money under the pillow. And then, I saved her tooth.

So eight months ago, I’m in the living room and Mulan comes in with this little baggie that had her tooth in it and says, “What is this?”

I’m like, “That’s apparently a child’s tooth.”

And she goes, “Uh-huh. Are you the tooth fairy?”

I said, “Yes, I am.”

And she goes, “And who is Santa Claus?!”

So I said, “OK. I’m Santa Claus.”

So it’s out. But then I go, “But don’t tell Coco, don’t start telling kids at school.”

I could see her little head working. She goes, “Well, all those letters I wrote to Santa Claus? So that was just writing them to you!”

And I go, “Yeah, that’s right.”

She goes, “Huh. So I don’t need to write a letter, I can just tell you what I want?”

And I said, “That’s right. And I can just tell you what I want.”

She goes, “Oh. Well, what if I still want to believe in Santa Claus?”

And I go, “Well, you can go ahead. Yeah, you can believe in Santa Claus.”

And she goes, “Well, I think, yeah, I think there is a Santa Claus. And I think if I’m good I get an American Girl doll!”

So it was this whole hilarious thing.

We’re going to Mexico City for Christmas this year. My fiancee, Michael, and I are in the car and Mulan’s in the back and she’s asking all these questions about Mexico. Now it’s triply awkward, because it’s already out, but now we’re kind of half-pretending it’s true.

She goes, “So how does Santa Claus get to Mexico?”

And I go, “He’s magic!”

Then she goes, “Ah, but does he come on Christmas Eve, or does he come on Christmas Day in Mexico?”

And I go, “Mulan, as you know, I’m Santa Claus, so, you know . . . whatever day you pick.”

She goes, “No, no! I believe in Santa Claus!”

I go, “OK.”

She goes, “So, what if they don’t like have a chimney?”

Michael says, “I think believing in Santa Claus is sort of like believing in God. If you want to do it, that’s fine. Just don’t ask too many questions.”

Which I thought was the greatest answer.

Isn’t she amazing?


Technorati Tags: ,

Popularity: 2% [?]

Atheist MySpace Group Still Defunct

Posted in Friendly Atheist at 12:00 pm by Hemant Mehta

The Atheist and Agnostic Group on MySpace (once, technically the largest atheist group in the world) is still deleted.

The Secular Student Alliance issued this press release:

“MySpace refuses to undelete the group, although it never violated any terms of service,” said Bryan Pesta, Ph.D., the group’s moderator. “When the largest Christian group was hacked, MySpace’s Founder, Tom Anderson, personally restored the group, and promised to protect it from future deletions.”

“It is an outrage if Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation and the world’s largest social networking site tolerate discrimination against atheists and agnostics– and if this situation goes unresolved I’ll have little choice but to believe they do,” said Greg Epstein, humanist chaplain of Harvard University. News Corporation, Murdoch’s global media corporation which also includes Fox News, purchased MySpace in 2005.

“My personal profile was deleted as well, and despite weeks of emails to customer service, plus a petition signed by 500 group members, MySpace won’t budge. I think these actions send a clear message to the 30 million godless people in America (and to businesses whose money was spent displaying ads on our group) that we are not welcome on MySpace,” said Pesta.

Tom, you are *so* removed from my Top Eight…

Unless you fix this. It shouldn’t be difficult. (And yes, I’m putting this all on you.)


Technorati Tags: ,

Popularity: 2% [?]

Help a Couple Seminary Students

Posted in Friendly Atheist at 8:00 am by Hemant Mehta

Josh and Karlene are seminary students looking to speak to non-Christians as part of a class project:

We are seminary students who have been given an assignment in one of our classes to have a series of conversations with others who do not share our Christian faith. The purpose of these conversations is NOT to convert anyone, but to practice talking about traditional elements of our Christian faith in ways that make sense, and even more importantly, listening to others about their beliefs and experiences. We are also interested in talking about the different assumptions atheists and Christians have about the “Christian message.” It is an exercise in friendly dialog across differences in belief, and for open, honest, and safe dialog together.

So we are asking for two conversation partners who would be willing to spend about an hour a week for the next 12 weeks talking on the phone or chatting online, who are not Christian and are interested in this type of friendly conversations with us.

Josh and Karlene

If you have questions or would like to speak with them, go to Conversation at the Edge to get their contact info.


Technorati Tags: , ,

Popularity: 1% [?]

Is the Catholic Church Approving Condoms?

Posted in Friendly Atheist at 1:00 am by Hemant Mehta

They are!

Kinda.

One year after the election of Pope Benedict XVI, the Vatican, in a reversal of church doctrine, is prepared to allow the use of condoms to combat AIDS.

In a victory for reform-minded critics of the Vatican, Pope Benedict XVI has now reversed the Catholic Church’s long-standing position with regard to the use of condoms to combat the spread of the HIV virus.

The Vatican’s “health minister” Cardinal Javier Lozano Barragan, who is close to the pope, told the Rome-based newspaper La Repubblica “It was the pope who took the initiative over this very sensitive and difficult issue.” Barragan, who is Mexican, added that the Vatican is preparing a document on condom use, but declined to reveal its details.

The Pope’s only decades behind everyone else now… he’s catching up!

Then again, he said the following on Monday:

“In an age when scientific developments attract and seduce with the possibilities they offer, it’s more important than ever to educate our contemporaries’ consciences so that science does not become the criteria for goodness,” he told scientists.

… the conservative German-born Pope’s public stand on issues such as abortion and embryonic stem-cell research lead critics to accuse him of holding antiquated views on science.

Is he contradicting himself? (Even if he is, might that be a good thing?)

(Thanks to Maria for the link!)


Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Popularity: 2% [?]

« Previous entries

Close
E-mail It