<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview Questions for Matthew Chapman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/07/06/interview-questions-for-matthew-chapman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/07/06/interview-questions-for-matthew-chapman/</link>
	<description>Atheism with Positivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:27:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wow! More on Atheist Alliance Convention 2007 &#171; Brasilmagic&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/07/06/interview-questions-for-matthew-chapman/comment-page-1/#comment-73619</link>
		<dc:creator>Wow! More on Atheist Alliance Convention 2007 &#171; Brasilmagic&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/07/06/interview-questions-for-matthew-chapman/#comment-73619</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens, Daniel Dennet, Julia Sweeney, Tom Wolfe and the great great grandson of Charles Darwin (Matthew Chapman). I just did not see Sam Harris, but he was probably around. What an amazing evening! Everyone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens, Daniel Dennet, Julia Sweeney, Tom Wolfe and the great great grandson of Charles Darwin (Matthew Chapman). I just did not see Sam Harris, but he was probably around. What an amazing evening! Everyone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly Atheist &#187; Interview Questions for Michael Estes and Pastor Deacon Fred</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/07/06/interview-questions-for-matthew-chapman/comment-page-1/#comment-66307</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendly Atheist &#187; Interview Questions for Michael Estes and Pastor Deacon Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/07/06/interview-questions-for-matthew-chapman/#comment-66307</guid>
		<description>[...] Matthew Chapman [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matthew Chapman [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Scott</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/07/06/interview-questions-for-matthew-chapman/comment-page-1/#comment-54387</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/07/06/interview-questions-for-matthew-chapman/#comment-54387</guid>
		<description>Hey Matt - I watched your commentary on c-span books last night. Though you are not encrusted with the vitriol of your other atheist amigos, you still can&#039;t resist the temptation of portraying creation science and I.D. proponents as neolithic low brow insurrectionists with no credibility. Your card stacking argument completely ignored the well know fact that there are legions of credentialed scientists, doctors, PhD&#039;s, professors and Nobel prize winners who recognize macro evolution as the most insidious &quot;scientific&quot; fraud ever perpetrated on mankind. To your credit though, you are the only Darwinist I have listened to or read who is willing to promote debate by allowing I.D. into a classroom setting.  And as for your characterization of I.D. as &quot;creationism in a lab coat,&quot; that is simply false. In fact, creation scientists  unanimously agree that I.D. is fundamentally different (and at odds with) Creationism as it presents an ambiguous concept of the prime architect.  Creation science endorses the literal Genesis account that identifies the creator as God,  while I.D. leaves origins open to speculation.  For this reason many creation scientists are actually opposed to Intelligent design theory. You also cleverly omitted the question that collapses evolutionary cosmology; &quot;Where did the first source matter come from?&quot;   BTW, atheism itself is a myth. Man is born hardwired with a knowledge of God. &quot;Atheists&quot; are simply rebelling against that knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matt &#8211; I watched your commentary on c-span books last night. Though you are not encrusted with the vitriol of your other atheist amigos, you still can&#8217;t resist the temptation of portraying creation science and I.D. proponents as neolithic low brow insurrectionists with no credibility. Your card stacking argument completely ignored the well know fact that there are legions of credentialed scientists, doctors, PhD&#8217;s, professors and Nobel prize winners who recognize macro evolution as the most insidious &#8220;scientific&#8221; fraud ever perpetrated on mankind. To your credit though, you are the only Darwinist I have listened to or read who is willing to promote debate by allowing I.D. into a classroom setting.  And as for your characterization of I.D. as &#8220;creationism in a lab coat,&#8221; that is simply false. In fact, creation scientists  unanimously agree that I.D. is fundamentally different (and at odds with) Creationism as it presents an ambiguous concept of the prime architect.  Creation science endorses the literal Genesis account that identifies the creator as God,  while I.D. leaves origins open to speculation.  For this reason many creation scientists are actually opposed to Intelligent design theory. You also cleverly omitted the question that collapses evolutionary cosmology; &#8220;Where did the first source matter come from?&#8221;   BTW, atheism itself is a myth. Man is born hardwired with a knowledge of God. &#8220;Atheists&#8221; are simply rebelling against that knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly Atheist &#187; Interview Questions for Eugenie Scott</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/07/06/interview-questions-for-matthew-chapman/comment-page-1/#comment-52837</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendly Atheist &#187; Interview Questions for Eugenie Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/07/06/interview-questions-for-matthew-chapman/#comment-52837</guid>
		<description>[...] Matthew Chapman [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matthew Chapman [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drunkentune</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/07/06/interview-questions-for-matthew-chapman/comment-page-1/#comment-52002</link>
		<dc:creator>drunkentune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 02:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/07/06/interview-questions-for-matthew-chapman/#comment-52002</guid>
		<description>I loved &#039;Runaway Jury&#039;; I&#039;m sure many others enjoyed the movie as well. If possible, (and it doesn&#039;t necessarily have to be on tape) please give him massive props from a fan for writing an excellent script loosely based on a so-so Grisham novel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved &#8216;Runaway Jury&#8217;; I&#8217;m sure many others enjoyed the movie as well. If possible, (and it doesn&#8217;t necessarily have to be on tape) please give him massive props from a fan for writing an excellent script loosely based on a so-so Grisham novel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: txatheist</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/07/06/interview-questions-for-matthew-chapman/comment-page-1/#comment-51992</link>
		<dc:creator>txatheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 00:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/07/06/interview-questions-for-matthew-chapman/#comment-51992</guid>
		<description>What do you think is the best book Charles wrote?   What book do you think is the best autobiography?  If you don&#039;t know that&#039;s cool but I am eagerly awaiting for a bust of Charles Darwin.  I called a statue company and they said they&#039;d get one somehow so I&#039;m waiting but she said it may be awhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think is the best book Charles wrote?   What book do you think is the best autobiography?  If you don&#8217;t know that&#8217;s cool but I am eagerly awaiting for a bust of Charles Darwin.  I called a statue company and they said they&#8217;d get one somehow so I&#8217;m waiting but she said it may be awhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat's Staff</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/07/06/interview-questions-for-matthew-chapman/comment-page-1/#comment-51958</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat's Staff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/07/06/interview-questions-for-matthew-chapman/#comment-51958</guid>
		<description>The AAI Convention is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.atheistalliance.org/conventions/2007/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sold out&lt;/a&gt;... Press passes are available.

Thursday night Pre-Convention Fund Raising Dessert Extravaganza spots still available.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AAI Convention is <a href="http://www.atheistalliance.org/conventions/2007/" rel="nofollow">sold out</a>&#8230; Press passes are available.</p>
<p>Thursday night Pre-Convention Fund Raising Dessert Extravaganza spots still available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
