<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hitchens vs. Sharpton, Part Deux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/</link>
	<description>Atheism with Positivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:23:21 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-50281</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/#comment-50281</guid>
		<description>two comments...agree with maria, sharpton does not represent christians, definitely not me...not sure about hitchens, he sure sweats a lot. both just want to sell something.

secondly, your comment on extreme anti-abortion views, not sure which slant this is taking. i do not endorse catholicism but i have a daughter who was born premature at 27 weeks (1lb 14 oz), she is going to be a freshman in high school this next term.

are you endorisng abortion as a viable birth control method, specifically for those who engage in consensual sex; is this really a humane decision?

it is difficult to comprehend that a society that embraces the advances of science, puts its faith in it, and abhors the atrocities of war, can think this is the best we can do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>two comments&#8230;agree with maria, sharpton does not represent christians, definitely not me&#8230;not sure about hitchens, he sure sweats a lot. both just want to sell something.</p>
<p>secondly, your comment on extreme anti-abortion views, not sure which slant this is taking. i do not endorse catholicism but i have a daughter who was born premature at 27 weeks (1lb 14 oz), she is going to be a freshman in high school this next term.</p>
<p>are you endorisng abortion as a viable birth control method, specifically for those who engage in consensual sex; is this really a humane decision?</p>
<p>it is difficult to comprehend that a society that embraces the advances of science, puts its faith in it, and abhors the atrocities of war, can think this is the best we can do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-49994</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/#comment-49994</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I have to give Sharpton some credit-he got a dig in at Hitchens when he said that Hitchens does have faith-faith in weapons of mass destruction being found in Iraq!
I actually wish they would pick someone-ANYONE-else to represent Christians and atheists in a debate. Both of these guys (in my opinion) are pompous blowhards who just like to hear themselves speak. I agree with some of Sharptons political views, and some of Hitchens atheist views, but the two of them together do nothing to advance intelligent debate on the subject. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree!

&lt;blockquote&gt;Righto. One rematch between the RRS and Comfort&amp;Cameron coming up.

Although I personally am waiting for the inevitable Rev. Phelps vs. David Mills debate. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

LOL, I&#039;d actually pay money to see that........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I have to give Sharpton some credit-he got a dig in at Hitchens when he said that Hitchens does have faith-faith in weapons of mass destruction being found in Iraq!<br />
I actually wish they would pick someone-ANYONE-else to represent Christians and atheists in a debate. Both of these guys (in my opinion) are pompous blowhards who just like to hear themselves speak. I agree with some of Sharptons political views, and some of Hitchens atheist views, but the two of them together do nothing to advance intelligent debate on the subject. </p></blockquote>
<p>I agree!</p>
<blockquote><p>Righto. One rematch between the RRS and Comfort&amp;Cameron coming up.</p>
<p>Although I personally am waiting for the inevitable Rev. Phelps vs. David Mills debate. </p></blockquote>
<p>LOL, I&#8217;d actually pay money to see that&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-49988</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/#comment-49988</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Although I personally am waiting for the inevitable Rev. Phelps vs. David Mills debate. 

&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Now that would be amusing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Although I personally am waiting for the inevitable Rev. Phelps vs. David Mills debate. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Now that would be amusing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-49915</link>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 18:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/#comment-49915</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I actually wish they would pick someone-ANYONE-else to represent Christians and atheists in a debate.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Righto.  One rematch between the RRS and Comfort&amp;Cameron coming up.

Although I personally am waiting for the inevitable Rev. Phelps vs. David Mills debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I actually wish they would pick someone-ANYONE-else to represent Christians and atheists in a debate.</p></blockquote>
<p>Righto.  One rematch between the RRS and Comfort&amp;Cameron coming up.</p>
<p>Although I personally am waiting for the inevitable Rev. Phelps vs. David Mills debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siamang</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-49913</link>
		<dc:creator>Siamang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 18:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/#comment-49913</guid>
		<description>And the whole &lt;a href=&quot;http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/1gmarchive/2007/06/hitchens_sharpt.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;debate is available here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the whole <a href="http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/1gmarchive/2007/06/hitchens_sharpt.html" rel="nofollow">debate is available here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siamang</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-49912</link>
		<dc:creator>Siamang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/#comment-49912</guid>
		<description>Oh man, Sharpton is so bad at arguing his position that I&#039;m pretty sure an atheist chose him to appear on the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man, Sharpton is so bad at arguing his position that I&#8217;m pretty sure an atheist chose him to appear on the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-49908</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/#comment-49908</guid>
		<description>I have to give Sharpton some credit-he got a dig in at Hitchens when he said that Hitchens does have faith-faith in weapons of mass destruction being found in Iraq!
I actually wish they would pick someone-ANYONE-else to represent Christians and atheists in a debate. Both of these guys (in my opinion) are pompous blowhards who just like to hear themselves speak. I agree with some of Sharptons political views, and some of Hitchens atheist views, but the two of them together do nothing to advance intelligent debate on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to give Sharpton some credit-he got a dig in at Hitchens when he said that Hitchens does have faith-faith in weapons of mass destruction being found in Iraq!<br />
I actually wish they would pick someone-ANYONE-else to represent Christians and atheists in a debate. Both of these guys (in my opinion) are pompous blowhards who just like to hear themselves speak. I agree with some of Sharptons political views, and some of Hitchens atheist views, but the two of them together do nothing to advance intelligent debate on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro Morgado</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-49903</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Morgado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/#comment-49903</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://avenidacentral.blogspot.com/2007/06/iraq-war-were-making-progress.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;We are making progress in Iraq war...”&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><b><a href="http://avenidacentral.blogspot.com/2007/06/iraq-war-were-making-progress.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;We are making progress in Iraq war&#8230;”</a></b></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro Morgado</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-49899</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Morgado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/#comment-49899</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://avenidacentral.blogspot.com/2007/06/iraq-war-were-making-progress.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;We are making progress in Iraq war...”&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><b><a href="http://avenidacentral.blogspot.com/2007/06/iraq-war-were-making-progress.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;We are making progress in Iraq war&#8230;”</a></b></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro Morgado</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-49902</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Morgado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/06/29/hitchen-vs-sharpton-part-deux/#comment-49902</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://avenidacentral.blogspot.com/2007/06/iraq-war-were-making-progress.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;We are making progress in Iraq war...”&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><b><a href="http://avenidacentral.blogspot.com/2007/06/iraq-war-were-making-progress.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;We are making progress in Iraq war&#8230;”</a></b></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
