<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: O&#8217;Leilly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://friendlyatheist.com/2006/12/21/oleilly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2006/12/21/oleilly/</link>
	<description>Atheism with Positivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:43:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Wade</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2006/12/21/oleilly/comment-page-1/#comment-2340</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 09:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2006/12/21/oleilly/#comment-2340</guid>
		<description>O&#039;Really makes Geraldo look like a great journalist.  When he doesn&#039;t have facts to support his position, he pulls &quot;facts&quot; of his own making out of the air like a magician.  About 90 percent of his interviews with anyone is &lt;em&gt;him&lt;/em&gt; talking.  That&#039;s why he calls it the &quot;O&#039;Really Factor,&quot; never letting the conversation stray far from his favorite subject.  He&#039;s a verbal bully who doesn&#039;t know how to handle an imperturbable guest.  I suspect that most of his viewers are simpletons who think he&#039;s brilliant.  Long live Keith Olberman!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217;Really makes Geraldo look like a great journalist.  When he doesn&#8217;t have facts to support his position, he pulls &#8220;facts&#8221; of his own making out of the air like a magician.  About 90 percent of his interviews with anyone is <em>him</em> talking.  That&#8217;s why he calls it the &#8220;O&#8217;Really Factor,&#8221; never letting the conversation stray far from his favorite subject.  He&#8217;s a verbal bully who doesn&#8217;t know how to handle an imperturbable guest.  I suspect that most of his viewers are simpletons who think he&#8217;s brilliant.  Long live Keith Olberman!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: txatheist</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2006/12/21/oleilly/comment-page-1/#comment-2107</link>
		<dc:creator>txatheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2006/12/21/oleilly/#comment-2107</guid>
		<description>Avery said &lt;blockquote&gt; It an employer wants to start a company meeting out with a prayer, we are powerless to do anything about(as long as there is no harassment or coercion involved), and if a company wants to say Happy Holidays…so be it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hobby Lobby and Chik-fil-A are private businesses and I do something about it.  I have never shopped or eaten there since I found out they are a outright xian owned company.  Hobby Lobby prints a full page ad in the Austin American Statesman on 12/25 acknowledging you know who&#039;s birthday and Chik-fil-A asks employees to sign an oath of integrity to high standards that Jesus would abide to.  They are also both closed on Sundays which is an exception for a large retailer and chain fast foot restaurant but that&#039;s their choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avery said<br />
<blockquote> It an employer wants to start a company meeting out with a prayer, we are powerless to do anything about(as long as there is no harassment or coercion involved), and if a company wants to say Happy Holidays…so be it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hobby Lobby and Chik-fil-A are private businesses and I do something about it.  I have never shopped or eaten there since I found out they are a outright xian owned company.  Hobby Lobby prints a full page ad in the Austin American Statesman on 12/25 acknowledging you know who&#8217;s birthday and Chik-fil-A asks employees to sign an oath of integrity to high standards that Jesus would abide to.  They are also both closed on Sundays which is an exception for a large retailer and chain fast foot restaurant but that&#8217;s their choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avery</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2006/12/21/oleilly/comment-page-1/#comment-2096</link>
		<dc:creator>Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2006/12/21/oleilly/#comment-2096</guid>
		<description>As an atheist I have no problem saying Merry Christmas....it is a federal holiday...  and the more we say it the more wind that will take out of the sails of the &quot;War on Christmas&quot; position.  It will emphasize the secular/cultural aspects of the holiday.  Most of it has nothing to do with religion anyway.  On the other hand a private business has the right to make whatever business decisions it wants.  It an employer wants to start a company meeting out with a prayer, we are powerless to do anything about(as long as there is no harassment or coercion involved), and if a company wants to say Happy Holidays...so be it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an atheist I have no problem saying Merry Christmas&#8230;.it is a federal holiday&#8230;  and the more we say it the more wind that will take out of the sails of the &#8220;War on Christmas&#8221; position.  It will emphasize the secular/cultural aspects of the holiday.  Most of it has nothing to do with religion anyway.  On the other hand a private business has the right to make whatever business decisions it wants.  It an employer wants to start a company meeting out with a prayer, we are powerless to do anything about(as long as there is no harassment or coercion involved), and if a company wants to say Happy Holidays&#8230;so be it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spin sycle</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2006/12/21/oleilly/comment-page-1/#comment-2063</link>
		<dc:creator>spin sycle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2006/12/21/oleilly/#comment-2063</guid>
		<description>how about Christyrannical!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about Christyrannical!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siamang</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2006/12/21/oleilly/comment-page-1/#comment-2038</link>
		<dc:creator>Siamang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2006/12/21/oleilly/#comment-2038</guid>
		<description>BWAAAAAA!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BWAAAAAA!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julie marie</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2006/12/21/oleilly/comment-page-1/#comment-2033</link>
		<dc:creator>julie marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2006/12/21/oleilly/#comment-2033</guid>
		<description>you mean those christianistically conservativion republicanits?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you mean those christianistically conservativion republicanits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siamang</title>
		<link>http://friendlyatheist.com/2006/12/21/oleilly/comment-page-1/#comment-2032</link>
		<dc:creator>Siamang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlyatheist.com/2006/12/21/oleilly/#comment-2032</guid>
		<description>I think we should spread a rumor that Rupert Murdoch has threatened to fire anyone who mentions Jesus, God or The Iraq Study Group without calling it the (Iraq Surrender Group) on the air on FOXNews.



Why does Bill O&#039; Reilly call it the &quot;atheistic&quot; point of view?  

Is it a rule that all Fox commentators either have to eliminate or add a meaningless syllable to every group they want to show derision to?

The Democrat Party
The atheistic point of view.


What do you expect from those Christianistical people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should spread a rumor that Rupert Murdoch has threatened to fire anyone who mentions Jesus, God or The Iraq Study Group without calling it the (Iraq Surrender Group) on the air on FOXNews.</p>
<p>Why does Bill O&#8217; Reilly call it the &#8220;atheistic&#8221; point of view?  </p>
<p>Is it a rule that all Fox commentators either have to eliminate or add a meaningless syllable to every group they want to show derision to?</p>
<p>The Democrat Party<br />
The atheistic point of view.</p>
<p>What do you expect from those Christianistical people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
